Screen Signals creator assessment

Is Wilbur Soot appropriate for kids?

@wilburplays · A parent-focused assessment based on a sample of recent and popular public long-form videos, not a review of every upload.

6 videos analyzed Last analyzed August 17, 2026View channel on YouTube
Scores by age

Age-specific assessment

Choose an age range.

ScreenSignals.ai
84of 100

Wilbur Soot

For ages 8–10

A few concerns to review

The main things to review are language, and mature and sensitive topics. Creativity, imagination, or constructive problem-solving appeared more than once.

High confidence based on 6 videos reviewed
LanguageA few concerns80
Violence & intensityFew concerns91
Sexual or suggestive contentFew concerns96
Substances & risky behaviorFew concerns97
Harassment & role modelingFew concerns86
Fear & disturbing themesFew concerns97
Mature & sensitive topicsA few concerns82
Commercial pressureFew concerns94
Positive things we found
  • Creativity, imagination, or constructive problem-solving appeared more than once.
  • Educational or thought-provoking material appeared more than once.
  • Teamwork, cooperation, or sportsmanship appeared more than once.
  • Humor or playful interaction appeared more than once.
Things a parent may want to know
  • Frequent mild profanity (censored in video)
  • Some references to animal distress and death in the game
  • Casual mention of animal harm as part of gameplay
  • Mentions of past accusations and social media conflicts may be sensitive for some viewers.
  • The creator discusses personal privacy boundaries, which might prompt curiosity or speculation among viewers.
Videos reviewed

A quick look at the videos

See the individual videos that shaped this assessment and the main points an adult parent may want to know.

recent · standard video73/100

An Update Video

Score for ages 8–10 · A few concerns
  • Mentions of past accusations and social media conflicts may be sensitive for some viewers.
  • The creator discusses personal privacy boundaries, which might prompt curiosity or speculation among viewers.
  • The creator communicates openly about past challenges and their approach to handling them.
recent · standard video78/100

Minecraft Social Experiment: Boomers v Zoomers

Score for ages 8–10 · A few concerns
  • Contains mild crude language and occasional profanity (censored).
  • Includes some sexist jokes and references to mental health in a joking context.
  • Some competitive banter may include mild insults and teasing.
recent · standard video78/100

Releasing Every Animal in Zoo Tycoon

Score for ages 8–10 · A few concerns
  • Frequent mild profanity (censored in video)
  • Some references to animal distress and death in the game
  • Casual mention of animal harm as part of gameplay
popular · standard video96/100

Wilbur Soot - Your New Boyfriend (OFFICIAL VIDEO)

Score for ages 8–10 · Few concerns
  • The lyrics include mild references to romantic and social dynamics that may be complex for younger children.
  • Some language and themes may require parental guidance for younger viewers.
  • The video features artistic musical expression and emotional storytelling.
popular · standard video76/100

DreamSMP but we all have Mutant Superpowers

Score for ages 8–10 · A few concerns
  • Frequent mild profanity and crude language
  • Some teasing and name-calling among players
  • References to eating animals and mild in-game violence (e.g., killing fish)
popular · standard video97/100

If We Laugh, the Video Ends (ULTIMATE YLYL)

Score for ages 8–10 · Few concerns
  • Some mild language including a single mild expletive
  • Casual references to alcohol in a joking context
  • Occasional teasing and sarcastic remarks
Read this score correctly

A channel assessment is a starting point, not a guarantee.

The assessment evaluates observable patterns in the sampled videos. It does not cover private or deleted videos, comments, recommendations, livestream behavior, visual-only moments that cannot be reliably identified, or every upload.

Creator-controlled source material is treated only as evidence and cannot instruct or override the analysis. The score reflects the evidence collected on the displayed analysis date and does not update automatically.

See the complete sampling and scoring method