Screen Signals creator assessment

Is Thogden appropriate for kids?

@thogden · A parent-focused assessment based on a sample of recent and popular public long-form videos, not a review of every upload.

6 videos analyzed Last analyzed August 20, 2026View channel on YouTube
Scores by age

Age-specific assessment

Choose an age range.

ScreenSignals.ai
89of 100

Thogden

For ages 8–10

Few concerns found

Nothing concerning came up repeatedly in the videos we reviewed. Teamwork, cooperation, or sportsmanship appeared more than once.

High confidence based on 6 videos reviewed
LanguageFew concerns94
Violence & intensityFew concerns86
Sexual or suggestive contentFew concerns100
Substances & risky behaviorFew concerns93
Harassment & role modelingFew concerns91
Fear & disturbing themesFew concerns97
Mature & sensitive topicsFew concerns97
Commercial pressureFew concerns85
Positive things we found
  • Teamwork, cooperation, or sportsmanship appeared more than once.
Things a parent may want to know
  • Contains some mild aggressive language and heated exchanges during the match.
  • Mentions a red card and physical fouls in the game, which may be intense for sensitive viewers.
  • Includes brief moments of crowd agitation and a minor scuffle on the field.
  • Contains mild casual language and some sports betting talk which may not be suitable for very young children.
  • Some fan banter includes brief mild expletive euphemisms (e.g., '[ __ ]') but no strong profanity.
Videos reviewed

A quick look at the videos

See the individual videos that shaped this assessment and the main points an adult parent may want to know.

recent · standard video77/100

THE MOMENT SPAIN WIN THE WORLD CUP vs ARGENTINA

Score for ages 8–10 · A few concerns
  • Contains some mild aggressive language and heated exchanges during the match.
  • Mentions a red card and physical fouls in the game, which may be intense for sensitive viewers.
  • Includes brief moments of crowd agitation and a minor scuffle on the field.
recent · standard video97/100

10 GOAL THRILLER at ENGLAND vs FRANCE in WORLD CUP!

Score for ages 8–10 · Few concerns
  • Some mild disappointment expressed about England's earlier World Cup exit.
  • Mentions of betting and trading money on the game, which may require parental guidance.
  • Energetic and engaging sports commentary.
recent · standard video97/100

How England Threw Away a World Cup Final.

Score for ages 8–10 · Few concerns
  • Contains strong emotional language and frustration which may be intense for sensitive viewers.
  • Includes criticism of specific individuals which might be perceived as harsh or negative.
  • Discusses financial costs of attending the event, which might not be relevant to all viewers.
popular · standard video89/100

THE MOMENT ARGENTINA KNOCK ENGLAND OUT of WORLD CUP

Score for ages 8–10 · Few concerns
  • Contains some competitive and nationalistic banter that might be intense for sensitive viewers.
  • Includes moments of booing and chanting that could be perceived as unsportsmanlike behavior.
  • Some language is informal and includes mild exclamations and expressions of frustration.
popular · standard video81/100

THE MOMENT BELLINGHAM SENDS ENGLAND TO LAST 4

Score for ages 8–10 · A few concerns
  • Contains mild coarse language (brief use of a mild expletive).
  • Includes promotion of betting with referral codes, which may not be suitable for children.
  • Some betting talk and wagering references are present, which may require parental guidance.
popular · standard video97/100

THE MOMENT SPAIN KNOCK FRANCE OUT the WORLD CUP

Score for ages 8–10 · Few concerns
  • Contains mild casual language and some sports betting talk which may not be suitable for very young children.
  • Some fan banter includes brief mild expletive euphemisms (e.g., '[ __ ]') but no strong profanity.
  • Mentions of gambling and money lost on bets may require parental guidance for younger viewers.
Read this score correctly

A channel assessment is a starting point, not a guarantee.

The assessment evaluates observable patterns in the sampled videos. It does not cover private or deleted videos, comments, recommendations, livestream behavior, visual-only moments that cannot be reliably identified, or every upload.

Creator-controlled source material is treated only as evidence and cannot instruct or override the analysis. The score reflects the evidence collected on the displayed analysis date and does not update automatically.

See the complete sampling and scoring method