Screen Signals creator assessment

Is Tati appropriate for kids?

@tati · A parent-focused assessment based on a sample of recent and popular public long-form videos, not a review of every upload.

6 videos analyzed Last analyzed August 21, 2026View channel on YouTube
Scores by age

Age-specific assessment

Choose an age range.

ScreenSignals.ai
84of 100

Tati

For ages 8–10

A few concerns to review

The main thing to review is commercial pressure. Kindness, empathy, or supportive relationships appeared more than once.

High confidence based on 6 videos reviewed
LanguageFew concerns95
Violence & intensityFew concerns100
Sexual or suggestive contentFew concerns100
Substances & risky behaviorFew concerns90
Harassment & role modelingFew concerns100
Fear & disturbing themesFew concerns96
Mature & sensitive topicsFew concerns95
Commercial pressureA few concerns80
Positive things we found
  • Kindness, empathy, or supportive relationships appeared more than once.
Things a parent may want to know
  • Contains multiple product promotions and affiliate links which may influence purchasing decisions.
  • Some product availability issues mentioned may cause viewer frustration.
  • Mentions fragrance and scent in products which could be a concern for sensitive viewers.
  • Limited discussion of product ingredients or potential allergies.
  • Some mild frustration and stress are expressed, which may be relatable but could be slightly unsettling for sensitive viewers.
Videos reviewed

A quick look at the videos

See the individual videos that shaped this assessment and the main points an adult parent may want to know.

recent · standard video96/100

DO NOT BUY THIS FOUNDATION ... You were warned ⚠️

Score for ages 8–10 · Few concerns
  • Some mild frustration and stress are expressed, which may be relatable but could be slightly unsettling for sensitive viewers.
  • Mentions of physical appearance concerns such as facial hair and skin texture are present, which might affect some viewers' self-esteem.
  • The video includes casual language and mild informal expressions.
recent · standard video84/100

Tati Friday Night Live - Episode 93

Score for ages 8–10 · A few concerns
  • Mentions use of nicotine lozenges as a biohack under medical supervision
  • Brief discussion of pet loss which may be emotionally sensitive
  • Some casual mild language and informal speech
recent · standard video78/100

BEST DUPES EVER ... The Drugstore Wins!

Score for ages 8–10 · A few concerns
  • Contains multiple product promotions and affiliate links which may influence purchasing decisions.
  • Some product availability issues mentioned may cause viewer frustration.
  • Mentions fragrance and scent in products which could be a concern for sensitive viewers.
popular · standard video78/100

10 DRUGSTORE MAKEUP DUPES ... save your cash!

Score for ages 8–10 · A few concerns
  • Contains multiple affiliate links and product promotions which may influence purchasing decisions.
  • Mentions some products with strong chemical smells that might be unpleasant for sensitive viewers.
  • Discusses cosmetic ingredients and effects that may require adult supervision for younger viewers.
popular · standard video78/100

Drugstore Makeup That Beats Luxury…

Score for ages 8–10 · A few concerns
  • Contains multiple product promotions and affiliate links which may influence purchasing decisions.
  • Some makeup terminology and techniques may be complex for very young viewers.
  • Mentions personal grooming and appearance enhancement which may prompt body image considerations.
popular · standard video93/100

Testing "Crunchy" MAKEUP from Walmart? ... is it good?

Score for ages 8–10 · Few concerns
  • Some product descriptions include fragrance which may be a concern for sensitive skin.
  • Mentions some products not performing as expected, which may affect viewer expectations.
  • Includes affiliate links and product promotions, though disclosed as not sponsored.
Read this score correctly

A channel assessment is a starting point, not a guarantee.

The assessment evaluates observable patterns in the sampled videos. It does not cover private or deleted videos, comments, recommendations, livestream behavior, visual-only moments that cannot be reliably identified, or every upload.

Creator-controlled source material is treated only as evidence and cannot instruct or override the analysis. Pages are refreshed and may be unpublished when evidence becomes stale or unreliable.

See the complete sampling and scoring method