Screen Signals creator assessment

Is Tannerites appropriate for kids?

@tannerites · A parent-focused assessment based on a sample of recent and popular public long-form videos, not a review of every upload.

6 videos analyzed Last analyzed August 17, 2026View channel on YouTube
Scores by age

Age-specific assessment

Choose an age range.

ScreenSignals.ai
88of 100

Tannerites

For ages 8–10

Few concerns found

The main thing to review is fear and disturbing themes. Teamwork, cooperation, or sportsmanship appeared more than once.

High confidence based on 6 videos reviewed
LanguageFew concerns96
Violence & intensityFew concerns96
Sexual or suggestive contentFew concerns100
Substances & risky behaviorFew concerns96
Harassment & role modelingFew concerns97
Fear & disturbing themesA few concerns84
Mature & sensitive topicsFew concerns100
Commercial pressureFew concerns93
Positive things we found
  • Teamwork, cooperation, or sportsmanship appeared more than once.
  • Kindness, empathy, or supportive relationships appeared more than once.
  • Perseverance, resilience, or healthy challenge appeared more than once.
  • Creativity, imagination, or constructive problem-solving appeared more than once.
  • Humor or playful interaction appeared more than once.
Things a parent may want to know
  • Contains scenes of a natural disaster with potential for fear or anxiety in sensitive children.
  • Includes moments of water entering the home, broken windows, and property damage which may be distressing.
  • Some mild expressions of fear and concern by family members.
  • Some mild peril in game challenges (e.g., drinking vinegar) which is brief and playful
  • Competitive elements may cause minor disappointment for some children
Videos reviewed

A quick look at the videos

See the individual videos that shaped this assessment and the main points an adult parent may want to know.

recent · standard video94/100

Eating ONLY Gas Station Food in Our COLOR for 24 HOURS!

Score for ages 8–10 · Few concerns
  • Some mild frustration expressed about eating only gas station food.
  • Brief mention of stomach discomfort due to the food challenge, but no graphic details.
  • Family-friendly content with no inappropriate language or mature themes.
recent · standard video96/100

We Played HEARTSTEAL in REAL LIFE!

Score for ages 8–10 · Few concerns
  • Some mild peril in game challenges (e.g., drinking vinegar) which is brief and playful
  • Competitive elements may cause minor disappointment for some children
  • Family-friendly content with positive interactions
recent · standard video97/100

Squishies NOT Allowed In School!

Score for ages 8–10 · Few concerns
  • Some mild classroom misbehavior and distractions are depicted.
  • Occasional mild language such as 'sorry' and casual speech.
  • Scenes of children trying to sneak around and avoid rules.
popular · standard video96/100

Soda Pop DANCERS Turned DEMON! Hunting Demon Hunters!

Score for ages 8–10 · Few concerns
  • Some fantasy elements involve 'demons' and 'demon hunters' which might be confusing or mildly scary for very young children.
  • The concept of children being 'changed' or 'marked' could be unsettling to sensitive viewers.
  • The story includes some mild tension and suspense around rescuing children.
popular · standard video76/100

I SURVIVED A Real Flash Flood!

Score for ages 8–10 · A few concerns
  • Contains scenes of a natural disaster with potential for fear or anxiety in sensitive children.
  • Includes moments of water entering the home, broken windows, and property damage which may be distressing.
  • Some mild expressions of fear and concern by family members.
popular · standard video92/100

LOST Family On My 16th Birthday! WORST Day Of My LIFE!

Score for ages 8–10 · Few concerns
  • Some mild suspense and mild distress when Lizzy is separated from her family in a crowded place.
  • Brief moments of mild fear related to being lost and searching for family members.
  • Positive family interactions and bonding.
Read this score correctly

A channel assessment is a starting point, not a guarantee.

The assessment evaluates observable patterns in the sampled videos. It does not cover private or deleted videos, comments, recommendations, livestream behavior, visual-only moments that cannot be reliably identified, or every upload.

Creator-controlled source material is treated only as evidence and cannot instruct or override the analysis. The score reflects the evidence collected on the displayed analysis date and does not update automatically.

See the complete sampling and scoring method