Screen Signals creator assessment

Is Stumble Guys appropriate for kids?

@stumbleguys · A parent-focused assessment based on a sample of recent and popular public long-form videos, not a review of every upload.

6 videos analyzed Last analyzed August 21, 2026View channel on YouTube
Scores by age

Age-specific assessment

Choose an age range.

ScreenSignals.ai
88of 100

Stumble Guys

For ages 8–10

Few concerns found

The main thing to review is commercial pressure.

High confidence based on 6 videos reviewed
LanguageFew concerns94
Violence & intensityFew concerns96
Sexual or suggestive contentFew concerns100
Substances & risky behaviorFew concerns100
Harassment & role modelingFew concerns93
Fear & disturbing themesFew concerns100
Mature & sensitive topicsFew concerns100
Commercial pressureA few concerns84
Positive things we found

No repeated positive theme came up.

Things a parent may want to know
  • Some minor informal language and slang typical of gaming streams
  • Mentions of cheating accusations but handled responsibly with instructions to report
  • Some chat messages include repeated phrases which could be considered spam by viewers.
  • The host occasionally switches languages which might confuse some younger viewers.
  • Some mild frustration and informal language are present but not offensive.
Videos reviewed

A quick look at the videos

See the individual videos that shaped this assessment and the main points an adult parent may want to know.

recent · standard video93/100

[TA/EN] TRICOLOUR [W] Tournament with @nobodygamingyt

Score for ages 8–10 · Few concerns
  • Some chat spam and repeated messages which may be overwhelming for younger viewers.
  • Fast-paced dialogue with occasional unclear or fragmented sentences that might be confusing for very young children.
  • Engaging community interaction with live chat participation and giveaways.
recent · standard video94/100

[EN/ES] [W] TOURNAMENT ft. ‪@ChenteSG

Score for ages 8–10 · Few concerns
  • Some minor informal language and slang typical of gaming streams
  • Mentions of cheating accusations but handled responsibly with instructions to report
  • Friendly and inclusive community interaction
recent · standard video95/100

[BR] [W] Tournament with @GuaxinTV!

Score for ages 8–10 · Few concerns
  • Some chat messages include mild slang and informal language typical of gaming streams.
  • The video includes some technical gaming jargon and abbreviations that may be confusing to very young children.
  • Friendly and encouraging tone promoting positive thinking and perseverance.
popular · standard video97/100

[HI/EN] [W] Tournament with @Fimehehehe

Score for ages 8–10 · Few concerns
  • Some mild frustration and informal language are present but not offensive.
  • There is occasional mention of players using bugs or exploits, though the host discourages this behavior.
  • The stream includes some technical difficulties and delays which may confuse younger viewers.
popular · standard video81/100

[BR] Stumble Creators World Cup GRAND FINAL with @GuaxinTV

Score for ages 8–10 · A few concerns
  • Some mild informal language and slang typical of gaming streams.
  • Commercial promotion of in-game purchases and channel memberships.
  • Competitive gaming context may include mild tension or frustration.
popular · standard video93/100

[EN/ES] Stumble Creators World Cup Lower Brackets GRAND FINAL with @ChenteSG

Score for ages 8–10 · Few concerns
  • Some chat messages include repeated phrases which could be considered spam by viewers.
  • The host occasionally switches languages which might confuse some younger viewers.
  • Friendly and engaging host interaction with viewers.
Read this score correctly

A channel assessment is a starting point, not a guarantee.

The assessment evaluates observable patterns in the sampled videos. It does not cover private or deleted videos, comments, recommendations, livestream behavior, visual-only moments that cannot be reliably identified, or every upload.

Creator-controlled source material is treated only as evidence and cannot instruct or override the analysis. Pages are refreshed and may be unpublished when evidence becomes stale or unreliable.

See the complete sampling and scoring method