Screen Signals creator assessment

Is STORROR appropriate for kids?

@storror · A parent-focused assessment based on a sample of recent and popular public long-form videos, not a review of every upload.

6 videos analyzed Last analyzed August 20, 2026View channel on YouTube
Scores by age

Age-specific assessment

Choose an age range.

86of 100
For ages 8–10

Low observed concern in the sample

STORROR scores 86 out of 100 for ages 8-10. The sampled videos produced a high score using the ages 8-10 rubric, with relatively few observed concerns. The most notable observed areas were language. A positive pattern was teamwork, cooperation, or sportsmanship appears in multiple sampled videos.

high confidence from the available video sample
LanguageMild observed concern82
Violence & intensityLow observed concern95
Sexual or suggestive contentLow observed concern100
Substances & risky behaviorLow observed concern100
Harassment & role modelingLow observed concern100
Fear & disturbing themesLow observed concern88
Mature & sensitive topicsLow observed concern89
Commercial pressureLow observed concern93
Positive patterns in the sample
  • Teamwork, cooperation, or sportsmanship appears in multiple sampled videos.
  • Perseverance, resilience, or healthy challenge appears in multiple sampled videos.
  • Humor or playful interaction appears in multiple sampled videos.
Things a parent may want to know
  • Mild use of profanity (censored in video).
  • Some scenes involve physical risk such as slipping, falling, and navigating cold water.
  • Brief moments of mild fear or tension due to fog and water conditions.
  • Some mild casual language (e.g., mild expletives)
  • Potentially risky physical stunts that should not be imitated without supervision
Videos reviewed

A quick look at the sample

See the individual videos that shaped this assessment and the main points an adult parent may want to know.

recent · standard video81/100

Moving forwards - Update 01/08/26

Score for ages 8–10 · Mild observed concern in the sample
  • The video references a sensitive situation that may involve distressing topics, though details are not explicit.
  • There is mention of a team member needing time to process a situation, which may imply emotional difficulty.
  • The video includes some mild informal language and partial censoring of a word.
recent · standard video97/100

Exploring Places We Shouldn't (LOST AT SEA)

Score for ages 8–10 · Low observed concern in the sample
  • Mild use of profanity (censored in video).
  • Some scenes involve physical risk such as slipping, falling, and navigating cold water.
  • Brief moments of mild fear or tension due to fog and water conditions.
recent · standard video76/100

Parkour Hide & Seek In Military Fort

Score for ages 8–10 · Mild observed concern in the sample
  • Mild strong language occasionally used.
  • Some mild physical risk from climbing and hiding in elevated or confined spaces.
  • Darkness and confined spaces may cause mild fear or discomfort for sensitive viewers.
popular · standard video97/100

STORROR TRY Dutch Canal Jumping 🇳🇱

Score for ages 8–10 · Low observed concern in the sample
  • Some mild language (brief expletives)
  • Physical risk inherent in the sport shown
  • Mentions of minor injuries like ankle pain
popular · standard video97/100

STORROR'S FIRST DOUBLE ROPE SWING 🇳🇱

Score for ages 8–10 · Low observed concern in the sample
  • Some mild casual language (e.g., mild expletives)
  • Potentially risky physical stunts that should not be imitated without supervision
  • Showcases athletic skill and teamwork
popular · standard video92/100

Straight Line Mission Up A Mountain (Don't Try) 🇪🇸

Score for ages 8–10 · Low observed concern in the sample
  • Contains mild coarse language occasionally
  • Depicts risky physical activity with potential for injury
  • Includes some tense moments related to safety and falling hazards
Read this score correctly

A channel assessment is a starting point, not a guarantee.

The assessment evaluates observable patterns in the sampled videos. It does not cover private or deleted videos, comments, recommendations, livestream behavior, visual-only moments that cannot be reliably identified, or every upload.

Creator-controlled source material is treated only as evidence and cannot instruct or override the analysis. Pages are refreshed and may be unpublished when evidence becomes stale or unreliable.

See the complete sampling and scoring method