Screen Signals creator assessment

Is Steve Mould appropriate for kids?

@stevemould · A parent-focused assessment based on a sample of recent and popular public long-form videos, not a review of every upload.

6 videos analyzed Last analyzed August 17, 2026View channel on YouTube
Scores by age

Age-specific assessment

Choose an age range.

ScreenSignals.ai
88of 100

Steve Mould

For ages 8–10

Few concerns found

The main thing to review is commercial pressure. Educational or thought-provoking material appeared more than once.

High confidence based on 6 videos reviewed
LanguageFew concerns100
Violence & intensityFew concerns96
Sexual or suggestive contentFew concerns100
Substances & risky behaviorFew concerns100
Harassment & role modelingFew concerns100
Fear & disturbing themesFew concerns96
Mature & sensitive topicsFew concerns95
Commercial pressureA few concerns84
Positive things we found
  • Educational or thought-provoking material appeared more than once.
  • Creativity, imagination, or constructive problem-solving appeared more than once.
Things a parent may want to know
  • Contains footage of real animal tissue being drilled, which may be unsettling to sensitive viewers
  • Technical language and concepts may be challenging for younger children
  • Mentions surgical procedures and anatomy that could be mature topics
  • Contains a product promotion and sales pitch, which may influence viewers.
  • Includes some technical jargon that might be challenging for younger children to fully understand.
Videos reviewed

A quick look at the videos

See the individual videos that shaped this assessment and the main points an adult parent may want to know.

recent · standard video78/100

The Euler Disc Is The Wrong Shape

Score for ages 8–10 · A few concerns
  • Contains a product promotion and sales pitch, which may influence viewers.
  • Includes some technical jargon that might be challenging for younger children to fully understand.
  • Provides clear, educational explanations of physics concepts related to spinning discs.
recent · standard video93/100

The Arm Spin That Stops a Fall

Score for ages 8–10 · Few concerns
  • Contains a brief commercial sponsorship segment promoting a data privacy service.
  • Some technical terms and concepts may be challenging for younger children without guidance.
  • Clear explanation of physics concepts like angular momentum and torque.
recent · standard video93/100

The Anti Trampoline Effect

Score for ages 8–10 · Few concerns
  • The video includes some technical language and concepts that may be challenging for younger children to fully grasp.
  • The sponsored segment promotes a commercial product, which may influence viewers' purchasing decisions.
  • The video provides a clear, educational explanation of complex physics concepts related to bouncing and vibrations.
popular · standard video100/100

NASA tested my chain theory in space

Score for ages 8–10 · Few concerns
  • Some scientific terminology and concepts may be challenging for very young children to fully understand.
  • The video references a public feud and record-breaking events, which are minor distractions but not harmful.
  • There is a brief mention of internet connectivity issues and technical challenges, which are neutral but could confuse younger viewers.
popular · standard video97/100

Do tire balancing beads actually work?

Score for ages 8–10 · Few concerns
  • Some technical terms and physics concepts may be challenging for younger children
  • Brief commercial sponsorship segment included
  • Mentions of vehicle speeds and mechanical concepts may require adult guidance for younger viewers
popular · standard video94/100

A Bone Drill On Human Skin

Score for ages 8–10 · Few concerns
  • Contains footage of real animal tissue being drilled, which may be unsettling to sensitive viewers
  • Technical language and concepts may be challenging for younger children
  • Mentions surgical procedures and anatomy that could be mature topics
Read this score correctly

A channel assessment is a starting point, not a guarantee.

The assessment evaluates observable patterns in the sampled videos. It does not cover private or deleted videos, comments, recommendations, livestream behavior, visual-only moments that cannot be reliably identified, or every upload.

Creator-controlled source material is treated only as evidence and cannot instruct or override the analysis. The score reflects the evidence collected on the displayed analysis date and does not update automatically.

See the complete sampling and scoring method