Screen Signals creator assessment

Is Steph Bohrer appropriate for kids?

@stephbohrer · A parent-focused assessment based on a sample of recent and popular public long-form videos, not a review of every upload.

6 videos analyzed Last analyzed August 21, 2026View channel on YouTube
Scores by age

Age-specific assessment

Choose an age range.

ScreenSignals.ai
84of 100

Steph Bohrer

For ages 8–10

A few concerns to review

The main thing to review is mature and sensitive topics. Kindness, empathy, or supportive relationships appeared more than once.

High confidence based on 6 videos reviewed
LanguageFew concerns96
Violence & intensityFew concerns96
Sexual or suggestive contentFew concerns89
Substances & risky behaviorFew concerns95
Harassment & role modelingFew concerns90
Fear & disturbing themesFew concerns95
Mature & sensitive topicsA few concerns80
Commercial pressureFew concerns93
Positive things we found
  • Kindness, empathy, or supportive relationships appeared more than once.
  • Creativity, imagination, or constructive problem-solving appeared more than once.
Things a parent may want to know
  • Mentions frustration with ticket purchasing and concert attendance logistics, which may be mildly stressful for sensitive viewers.
  • Discusses a personal medical condition (RCPD) and related discomfort, which is briefly described but not graphic.
  • Mentions minor anxiety related to social media use, but no explicit negative content.
  • Some references to minor travel mishaps and frustrations, but handled lightly and humorously.
  • Mentions of mature themes such as trauma, grief, mental health struggles, and death occur, which may require parental guidance for younger viewers.
Videos reviewed

A quick look at the videos

See the individual videos that shaped this assessment and the main points an adult parent may want to know.

recent · standard video83/100

coziest girls trip to Maine — cottage on the lake 🌲🫐🦞🏠

Score for ages 8–10 · A few concerns
  • Contains a detailed description of an uncomfortable and inappropriate encounter with a man on an airplane, which may be unsettling for some viewers.
  • Mentions mild alcohol consumption (wine) during the trip.
  • Includes some mild language and casual references to bodily functions and personal hygiene routines.
recent · standard video93/100

A Very Spontaneous Summer Weekend — basically a 50 minute FaceTime call

Score for ages 8–10 · Few concerns
  • Mentions frustration with ticket purchasing and concert attendance logistics, which may be mildly stressful for sensitive viewers.
  • Discusses a personal medical condition (RCPD) and related discomfort, which is briefly described but not graphic.
  • Positive depiction of friendship and socializing in small groups.
recent · standard video97/100

spend a weekend at the beach house with me

Score for ages 8–10 · Few concerns
  • Some mild social awkwardness and minor teasing among friends
  • Brief mention of feeling tired and overwhelmed socially
  • Positive depiction of family and friendship bonds
popular · standard video98/100

what I did during a month with no phone

Score for ages 8–10 · Few concerns
  • Mentions minor anxiety related to social media use, but no explicit negative content.
  • Some references to minor travel mishaps and frustrations, but handled lightly and humorously.
  • Promotes mental health by encouraging breaks from social media.
popular · standard video96/100

a rainy week in the english countryside

Score for ages 8–10 · Few concerns
  • Shows positive friendship and travel experiences
  • Encourages appreciation of nature and local culture
  • Includes moments of relaxation and self-care
popular · standard video70/100

Every Book I Read in 2025

Score for ages 8–10 · A few concerns
  • Mentions of mature themes such as trauma, grief, mental health struggles, and death occur, which may require parental guidance for younger viewers.
  • Some books discussed include psychological thriller elements and triggering content, with warnings advised before reading those books.
  • The video includes brief mentions of romance tropes and relationship dynamics, but without explicit content.
Read this score correctly

A channel assessment is a starting point, not a guarantee.

The assessment evaluates observable patterns in the sampled videos. It does not cover private or deleted videos, comments, recommendations, livestream behavior, visual-only moments that cannot be reliably identified, or every upload.

Creator-controlled source material is treated only as evidence and cannot instruct or override the analysis. Pages are refreshed and may be unpublished when evidence becomes stale or unreliable.

See the complete sampling and scoring method