Screen Signals creator assessment

Is Sidemen appropriate for kids?

@sidemen · A parent-focused assessment based on a sample of recent and popular public long-form videos, not a review of every upload.

12 videos analyzed Last analyzed August 18, 2026View channel on YouTube
Scores by age

Age-specific assessment

Choose an age range.

ScreenSignals.ai
80of 100

Sidemen

For ages 8–10

A few concerns to review

The main things to review are language, and commercial pressure. Teamwork, cooperation, or sportsmanship appeared more than once.

High confidence based on 12 videos reviewed
LanguageA few concerns76
Violence & intensityFew concerns92
Sexual or suggestive contentA few concerns84
Substances & risky behaviorFew concerns94
Harassment & role modelingFew concerns92
Fear & disturbing themesFew concerns96
Mature & sensitive topicsFew concerns92
Commercial pressureA few concerns78
Positive things we found
  • Teamwork, cooperation, or sportsmanship appeared more than once.
  • Humor or playful interaction appeared more than once.
  • Educational or thought-provoking material appeared more than once.
  • Perseverance, resilience, or healthy challenge appeared more than once.
  • Creativity, imagination, or constructive problem-solving appeared more than once.
Things a parent may want to know
  • Contains sexual innuendo and suggestive language that may be inappropriate for younger viewers.
  • Includes mild to moderate profanity and crude jokes.
  • Some lines and comments could be perceived as disrespectful or offensive, especially towards women.
  • There are references to bodily functions and some crude humor that might be unsettling for sensitive viewers.
  • Mild strong language (e.g., use of 'fuck').
Videos reviewed

A quick look at the videos

See the individual videos that shaped this assessment and the main points an adult parent may want to know.

recent · standard video70/100

SIDEMEN AMONG US IRL BUT IT’S THE DUMBEST LOBBY EVER

Score for ages 8–10 · A few concerns
  • Mild strong language (e.g., use of 'fuck').
  • References to stabbing and killing in a game context.
  • Repeated commercial promotions and links in the description.
recent · standard video45/100

SIDEMEN TINDER IRL IS BACK

Score for ages 8–10 · Many concerns
  • Contains sexual innuendo and suggestive language that may be inappropriate for younger viewers.
  • Includes mild to moderate profanity and crude jokes.
  • Some lines and comments could be perceived as disrespectful or offensive, especially towards women.
recent · standard video76/100

SIDEMEN VS AMERICA’S BIGGEST STREAMERS

Score for ages 8–10 · A few concerns
  • Contains frequent mild strong language and some crude humor.
  • Some competitive tension includes light insults and name-calling.
  • Participants occasionally use profane language and mild aggressive expressions.
recent · standard video76/100

SIDEMEN BET $100,000 ON YOUTUBERS

Score for ages 8–10 · A few concerns
  • Frequent mild strong language and casual profanity
  • Gambling and betting are central themes, which may require parental guidance
  • Some physical challenges involve mild risk but no serious harm
recent · standard video97/100

SIDEMEN ABANDONED IN ASIA

Score for ages 8–10 · Few concerns
  • Some mild language and casual slang are present but not pervasive or strong.
  • Brief references to bodily functions and discomfort due to heat and travel conditions.
  • Some scenes involve minor physical challenges and discomfort but no serious harm or distress.
popular · standard video97/100

SIDEMEN GUESS THE FOOTBALLER ft Erling Haaland

Score for ages 8–10 · Few concerns
  • Some mild teasing and light insults about players' abilities and physique, but generally playful and not harsh.
  • Use of casual slang and informal language that may be unfamiliar to younger children.
  • Mentions of injuries (e.g., ACL) in a non-graphic context.
popular · standard video78/100

SIDEMEN $20,000 vs $200 HOLIDAY (ASIA EDITION)

Score for ages 8–10 · A few concerns
  • Mild crude language and some swearing
  • References to alcohol consumption and shots
  • Some scenes of mild physical competition (Muay Thai)
popular · standard video92/100

SIDEMEN CHARITY MATCH 2026 (GOALS & HIGHLIGHTS)

Score for ages 8–10 · Few concerns
  • Some mild physical contact described (e.g., fouls, tackles, a player taking a knee to the face) but typical for sports context.
  • Playful teasing and banter that is light and non-hostile.
  • Energetic and humorous commentary enhances engagement.
popular · standard video70/100

SIDEMEN AMONG US IRL BUT THE IMPOSTORS DON'T KNOW EACH OTHER

Score for ages 8–10 · A few concerns
  • Frequent mild profanity and some crude language
  • Some tense moments with accusations and suspicion
  • Occasional references to stabbing and killing in a game context
popular · standard video76/100

SIDEMEN $100,000 HOUSE PARTY

Score for ages 8–10 · A few concerns
  • Mild profanity and crude language throughout
  • References to gambling and betting
  • Some crude jokes and mild sexual innuendo
popular · standard video81/100

First to Find KSI Wins $20,000

Score for ages 8–10 · A few concerns
  • Contains mild profanity and casual use of mild swear words.
  • Includes some competitive teasing and insults that may not be suitable for very young children.
  • Some scenes involve mild physical exertion and minor risk of injury (e.g., rolling ankles).
popular · standard video76/100

SIDEMEN LAST TO PEE WINS $20,000

Score for ages 8–10 · A few concerns
  • Frequent use of mild to moderate coarse language and slang.
  • References to bodily functions and crude humor may be uncomfortable for some children.
  • Some competitive tension and mild insults among participants.
Read this score correctly

A channel assessment is a starting point, not a guarantee.

The assessment evaluates observable patterns in the sampled videos. It does not cover private or deleted videos, comments, recommendations, livestream behavior, visual-only moments that cannot be reliably identified, or every upload.

Creator-controlled source material is treated only as evidence and cannot instruct or override the analysis. The score reflects the evidence collected on the displayed analysis date and does not update automatically.

See the complete sampling and scoring method