ScreenSignals creator assessment

Is Sickos appropriate for kids?

@sickos · A parent-focused assessment based on a sample of recent and popular public videos—not a review of every upload.

6 videos analyzed Last analyzed August 12, 2026View channel on YouTube
Scores by age

Age-specific assessment

Choose an age range.

86of 100
For ages 8–10

Low observed concern

Sickos showed low observed concern for ages 8-10 across 6 analyzed videos. The most notable observed areas were language and commercial pressure. A positive pattern was kindness, empathy, or supportive relationships appear in multiple sampled videos.

high confidence from the available video sample
LanguageMild observed concern82
Violence & intensityLow observed concern87
Sexual or suggestive contentLow observed concern100
Substances & risky behaviorLow observed concern97
Harassment & role modelingLow observed concern95
Fear & disturbing themesLow observed concern86
Mature & sensitive topicsLow observed concern96
Commercial pressureMild observed concern82
Positive patterns in the sample
  • Kindness, empathy, or supportive relationships appear in multiple sampled videos.
  • Perseverance, resilience, or healthy challenge appears in multiple sampled videos.
  • Teamwork, cooperation, or sportsmanship appears in multiple sampled videos.
  • Humor or playful interaction appears in multiple sampled videos.
Things a parent may want to know
  • Contains mild profanities and casual strong language
  • Depicts risky and potentially dangerous stunts that could encourage imitation
  • Includes a commercial promotion segment with repeated product appeals
  • Some scenes may be mildly frightening due to high-risk activities and descriptions of fear
  • Mild profanity used occasionally
Videos reviewed

A quick look at the sample

See the individual videos that shaped this assessment and the main points an adult parent may want to know.

recent · standard video78/100

Massive Bike Jump Off Cliff

Score for ages 8–10 · Mild observed concern
  • Contains mild profanities and casual strong language
  • Depicts risky and potentially dangerous stunts that could encourage imitation
  • Includes a commercial promotion segment with repeated product appeals
recent · standard video93/100

This Thing Shouldn't Work...

Score for ages 8–10 · Low observed concern
  • Mild profanity used occasionally
  • Some physical risk-taking with the toy in water
  • A prank involving pouring water on a sleeping person
recent · standard video97/100

The Craziest World Cup Party On The Planet

Score for ages 8–10 · Low observed concern
  • Large crowds and intense excitement may be overwhelming or unsafe for some children.
  • Brief references to alcohol consumption (tequila shared among partygoers).
  • Some moments of mild physical risk during river surfing and electric shock game, though presented in a lighthearted manner.
popular · standard video78/100

This Slip N' Slide Got Out Of Hand...

Score for ages 8–10 · Mild observed concern
  • Mild strong language is present, including occasional profanity.
  • The extreme stunts involve risk and could encourage unsafe imitation.
  • There is commercial pressure through repeated merchandise promotion.
popular · standard video85/100

I Ordered A Banned Flying Tube

Score for ages 8–10 · Low observed concern
  • Contains mild profanity and slang expressions
  • Depicts risky physical stunts with potential for injury
  • Includes peer pressure to participate in dangerous activities
popular · standard video78/100

300 Pound Sumo Wrestler vs Blob

Score for ages 8–10 · Mild observed concern
  • Contains multiple instances of mild strong language (e.g., 'holy [__]')
  • Some stunts involve risk and could encourage risky behavior if imitated
  • Mentions 'poop water' which may be off-putting to some viewers
Read this score correctly

A channel assessment is a starting point, not a guarantee.

The assessment evaluates observable patterns in the sampled videos. It does not cover private or deleted videos, comments, recommendations, livestream behavior, visual-only moments that cannot be reliably identified, or every upload.

Creator-controlled source material is treated only as evidence and cannot instruct or override the analysis. Pages are refreshed and may be unpublished when evidence becomes stale or unreliable.

See the complete sampling and scoring method