Screen Signals creator assessment

Is Shadoune666 appropriate for kids?

@shadoune666 · A parent-focused assessment based on a sample of recent and popular public long-form videos, not a review of every upload.

6 videos analyzed Last analyzed August 20, 2026View channel on YouTube
Scores by age

Age-specific assessment

Choose an age range.

ScreenSignals.ai
76of 100

Shadoune666

For ages 8–10

A few concerns to review

The main things to review are violence and intensity, and language. Teamwork, cooperation, or sportsmanship appeared more than once.

High confidence based on 6 videos reviewed
LanguageA few concerns81
Violence & intensityA few concerns72
Sexual or suggestive contentFew concerns100
Substances & risky behaviorFew concerns100
Harassment & role modelingFew concerns94
Fear & disturbing themesFew concerns97
Mature & sensitive topicsFew concerns100
Commercial pressureFew concerns86
Positive things we found
  • Teamwork, cooperation, or sportsmanship appeared more than once.
  • Humor or playful interaction appeared more than once.
  • Perseverance, resilience, or healthy challenge appeared more than once.
Things a parent may want to know
  • Contains mild profanity and casual use of some slang terms.
  • Includes in-game combat and references to fighting and killing mobs.
  • Promotional content with membership offers and referral links.
  • Contains mild profanity occasionally, such as 'What the fuck' and similar expressions.
  • Depicts virtual violence typical of PvP gaming, including player attacks and eliminations.
Videos reviewed

A quick look at the videos

See the individual videos that shaped this assessment and the main points an adult parent may want to know.

recent · standard video93/100

Hay un Traidor en el Team Mafia... 🤯

Score for ages 8–10 · Few concerns
  • The game involves themes of deception, lying, and elimination which may be confusing or distressing for very young children.
  • Some mild informal language and slang are present, typical of casual gaming conversations.
  • The competitive and accusatory nature of the game might be intense for sensitive viewers.
recent · standard video77/100

Cumplí TODOS los RETOS que me dejaron 🏆

Score for ages 8–10 · A few concerns
  • Contains mild profanity and casual use of some slang terms.
  • Includes in-game combat and references to fighting and killing mobs.
  • Promotional content with membership offers and referral links.
recent · standard video76/100

TEAM MAFIA EN REINO SMP 🏆

Score for ages 8–10 · A few concerns
  • Mild profanity and slang are present throughout the dialogue.
  • Some frustration and mild insults occur, reflecting competitive gaming culture.
  • Mentions of in-game violence and combat, though non-graphic and game-based.
popular · standard video76/100

1 Pro vs 400 Cazadores ⚔️

Score for ages 8–10 · A few concerns
  • Contains mild profanity and slang that may be inappropriate for very young children.
  • Features virtual combat and violence, including player eliminations and weapon use.
  • Includes some tense moments and mild frustration expressed by the player.
popular · standard video92/100

Invité el Mejor Jugador del Mundo a mi Torneo... (salió mal 😭)

Score for ages 8–10 · Few concerns
  • Contains occasional mild Spanish profanity (e.g., 'cabrón', 'hijo de [__]').
  • Some tense moments in PvP combat and competitive gameplay.
  • Use of some slang and informal language that may be unfamiliar to younger children.
popular · standard video66/100

Me enfrenté a 400 Jugadores en Lucky Blocks Minecraft ⚔️

Score for ages 8–10 · Some concerns
  • Contains mild profanity occasionally, such as 'What the fuck' and similar expressions.
  • Depicts virtual violence typical of PvP gaming, including player attacks and eliminations.
  • Includes some chaotic and intense gaming moments that might be overwhelming for very young children.
Read this score correctly

A channel assessment is a starting point, not a guarantee.

The assessment evaluates observable patterns in the sampled videos. It does not cover private or deleted videos, comments, recommendations, livestream behavior, visual-only moments that cannot be reliably identified, or every upload.

Creator-controlled source material is treated only as evidence and cannot instruct or override the analysis. The score reflects the evidence collected on the displayed analysis date and does not update automatically.

See the complete sampling and scoring method