Screen Signals creator assessment

Is Pegasus appropriate for kids?

@pegasus · A parent-focused assessment based on a sample of recent and popular public long-form videos, not a review of every upload.

5 videos analyzed Last analyzed August 20, 2026View channel on YouTube
Scores by age

Age-specific assessment

Choose an age range.

ScreenSignals.ai
99of 100

Pegasus

For ages 8–10

Few concerns found

Nothing concerning came up repeatedly in the videos we reviewed.

Medium confidence based on 5 videos reviewed
LanguageFew concerns95
Violence & intensityFew concerns97
Sexual or suggestive contentFew concerns100
Substances & risky behaviorFew concerns100
Harassment & role modelingFew concerns100
Fear & disturbing themesFew concerns100
Mature & sensitive topicsFew concerns100
Commercial pressureFew concerns100
Positive things we found

No repeated positive theme came up.

Things a parent may want to know
  • Some informal speech and fragmented sentences may be confusing for very young children
  • Mentions of minor discomfort or minor incidents (e.g., stepping on someone) but no serious harm
  • Some technical terms and informal speech might be confusing for very young children.
  • Some terminology and context may be unfamiliar to young children without prior knowledge of horse training.
  • The video includes some technical jargon that might require adult explanation for younger viewers.
Videos reviewed

A quick look at the videos

See the individual videos that shaped this assessment and the main points an adult parent may want to know.

recent · standard video100/100

Paarden naar het land 2011

Score for ages 8–10 · Few concerns
  • Contains positive and encouraging expressions
  • Includes musical elements that may be engaging for children
recent · standard video98/100

Onscherpe video mennen kootwijk

Score for ages 8–10 · Few concerns
  • Some technical terms and informal speech might be confusing for very young children.
  • Casual, informal conversation that may be relatable and engaging for viewers interested in driving or vehicle handling.
  • No inappropriate language or mature themes present.
recent · standard video97/100

Kamp Kootwijk 1

Score for ages 8–10 · Few concerns
  • Some informal speech and fragmented sentences may be confusing for very young children
  • Mentions of minor discomfort or minor incidents (e.g., stepping on someone) but no serious harm
  • Casual and friendly social interaction among participants
popular · standard video100/100

Concord deel 3 (oude versie 2011)

Score for ages 8–10 · Few concerns
  • Some terminology and context may be unfamiliar to young children without prior knowledge of horse training.
  • The video includes some technical jargon that might require adult explanation for younger viewers.
  • Provides clear, practical instructions on handling longe lines and equipment.
popular · standard video100/100

Concord presentatie 1 (oude versie 2011)

Score for ages 8–10 · Few concerns
  • The video is fragmented and may be difficult for younger children to follow due to language complexity and topic specificity.
  • Educational content about horse training and equipment.
  • Demonstrates positive interaction and trust-building with animals.
Read this score correctly

A channel assessment is a starting point, not a guarantee.

The assessment evaluates observable patterns in the sampled videos. It does not cover private or deleted videos, comments, recommendations, livestream behavior, visual-only moments that cannot be reliably identified, or every upload.

Creator-controlled source material is treated only as evidence and cannot instruct or override the analysis. The score reflects the evidence collected on the displayed analysis date and does not update automatically.

See the complete sampling and scoring method