Screen Signals creator assessment

Is Khan Academy appropriate for kids?

@khanacademy · A parent-focused assessment based on a sample of recent and popular public long-form videos, not a review of every upload.

6 videos analyzed Last analyzed August 19, 2026View channel on YouTube
Scores by age

Age-specific assessment

Choose an age range.

ScreenSignals.ai
98of 100

Khan Academy

For ages 8–10

Few concerns found

Nothing concerning came up repeatedly in the videos we reviewed.

High confidence based on 6 videos reviewed
LanguageFew concerns100
Violence & intensityFew concerns100
Sexual or suggestive contentFew concerns100
Substances & risky behaviorFew concerns100
Harassment & role modelingFew concerns100
Fear & disturbing themesFew concerns97
Mature & sensitive topicsFew concerns94
Commercial pressureFew concerns100
Positive things we found

No repeated positive theme came up.

Things a parent may want to know
  • Mentions the existence of deep fakes and AI-generated false videos, which may be confusing for very young children.
  • Discusses political ads and media bias, which may require some maturity to fully understand.
  • The content assumes some prior knowledge of physics and mathematics, which may be challenging for very young children.
  • The idealized scenario (no friction or air resistance) may differ from real-world experiences, requiring adult guidance for full understanding.
Videos reviewed

A quick look at the videos

See the individual videos that shaped this assessment and the main points an adult parent may want to know.

recent · standard video100/100

Resonance | AP Physics | Khan Academy

Score for ages 8–10 · Few concerns
  • Clear explanation of physics concepts related to oscillations and resonance
  • Use of practical demonstrations and simulations to illustrate ideas
  • Encourages critical thinking by prompting viewers to pause and consider questions
recent · standard video100/100

Modeling pendulums | AP Physics | Khan Academy

Score for ages 8–10 · Few concerns
  • Clear explanation of physical pendulums and related physics concepts
  • Step-by-step derivation of formulas for pendulum periods
  • Use of analogies to springs to aid understanding
recent · standard video100/100

Modeling spring-mass oscillators | AP Physics | Khan Academy

Score for ages 8–10 · Few concerns
  • Clear explanation of physics concepts related to simple harmonic motion.
  • Step-by-step mathematical derivation suitable for learners.
  • No inappropriate language or content.
popular · standard video100/100

SHM of simple pendulums | AP Physics | Khan Academy

Score for ages 8–10 · Few concerns
  • Clear explanation of physics concepts related to pendulums and SHM
  • Educational content suitable for students learning AP Physics
  • No inappropriate language or content
popular · standard video91/100

How to spot misinformation | Democracy today | US government and civics | Khan Academy

Score for ages 8–10 · Few concerns
  • Mentions the existence of deep fakes and AI-generated false videos, which may be confusing for very young children.
  • Discusses political ads and media bias, which may require some maturity to fully understand.
  • Provides clear definitions of misinformation and disinformation.
popular · standard video100/100

SHM of spring-mass oscillators | AP Physics | Khan Academy

Score for ages 8–10 · Few concerns
  • The content assumes some prior knowledge of physics and mathematics, which may be challenging for very young children.
  • The idealized scenario (no friction or air resistance) may differ from real-world experiences, requiring adult guidance for full understanding.
  • Clear and detailed explanation of SHM concepts suitable for educational purposes.
Read this score correctly

A channel assessment is a starting point, not a guarantee.

The assessment evaluates observable patterns in the sampled videos. It does not cover private or deleted videos, comments, recommendations, livestream behavior, visual-only moments that cannot be reliably identified, or every upload.

Creator-controlled source material is treated only as evidence and cannot instruct or override the analysis. The score reflects the evidence collected on the displayed analysis date and does not update automatically.

See the complete sampling and scoring method