Screen Signals creator assessment

Is Khan Academy appropriate for kids?

@khanacademy · A parent-focused assessment based on a sample of recent and popular public long-form videos, not a review of every upload.

6 videos analyzed Last analyzed August 19, 2026View channel on YouTube
Scores by age

Age-specific assessment

Choose an age range.

98of 100
For ages 8–10

Low observed concern in the sample

Khan Academy scores 98 out of 100 for ages 8-10. The sampled videos produced a high score using the ages 8-10 rubric, with relatively few observed concerns. The sampled videos did not show a recurring high-concern pattern.

high confidence from the available video sample
LanguageLow observed concern100
Violence & intensityLow observed concern100
Sexual or suggestive contentLow observed concern100
Substances & risky behaviorLow observed concern100
Harassment & role modelingLow observed concern100
Fear & disturbing themesLow observed concern97
Mature & sensitive topicsLow observed concern94
Commercial pressureLow observed concern100
Positive patterns in the sample

No recurring positive pattern was recorded.

Things a parent may want to know
  • Mentions the existence of deep fakes and AI-generated false videos, which may be confusing for very young children.
  • Discusses political ads and media bias, which may require some maturity to fully understand.
  • The content assumes some prior knowledge of physics and mathematics, which may be challenging for very young children.
  • The idealized scenario (no friction or air resistance) may differ from real-world experiences, requiring adult guidance for full understanding.
Videos reviewed

A quick look at the sample

See the individual videos that shaped this assessment and the main points an adult parent may want to know.

recent · standard video100/100

Resonance | AP Physics | Khan Academy

Score for ages 8–10 · Low observed concern in the sample
  • Clear explanation of physics concepts related to oscillations and resonance
  • Use of practical demonstrations and simulations to illustrate ideas
  • Encourages critical thinking by prompting viewers to pause and consider questions
recent · standard video100/100

Modeling pendulums | AP Physics | Khan Academy

Score for ages 8–10 · Low observed concern in the sample
  • Clear explanation of physical pendulums and related physics concepts
  • Step-by-step derivation of formulas for pendulum periods
  • Use of analogies to springs to aid understanding
recent · standard video100/100

Modeling spring-mass oscillators | AP Physics | Khan Academy

Score for ages 8–10 · Low observed concern in the sample
  • Clear explanation of physics concepts related to simple harmonic motion.
  • Step-by-step mathematical derivation suitable for learners.
  • No inappropriate language or content.
popular · standard video100/100

SHM of simple pendulums | AP Physics | Khan Academy

Score for ages 8–10 · Low observed concern in the sample
  • Clear explanation of physics concepts related to pendulums and SHM
  • Educational content suitable for students learning AP Physics
  • No inappropriate language or content
popular · standard video91/100

How to spot misinformation | Democracy today | US government and civics | Khan Academy

Score for ages 8–10 · Low observed concern in the sample
  • Mentions the existence of deep fakes and AI-generated false videos, which may be confusing for very young children.
  • Discusses political ads and media bias, which may require some maturity to fully understand.
  • Provides clear definitions of misinformation and disinformation.
popular · standard video100/100

SHM of spring-mass oscillators | AP Physics | Khan Academy

Score for ages 8–10 · Low observed concern in the sample
  • The content assumes some prior knowledge of physics and mathematics, which may be challenging for very young children.
  • The idealized scenario (no friction or air resistance) may differ from real-world experiences, requiring adult guidance for full understanding.
  • Clear and detailed explanation of SHM concepts suitable for educational purposes.
Read this score correctly

A channel assessment is a starting point, not a guarantee.

The assessment evaluates observable patterns in the sampled videos. It does not cover private or deleted videos, comments, recommendations, livestream behavior, visual-only moments that cannot be reliably identified, or every upload.

Creator-controlled source material is treated only as evidence and cannot instruct or override the analysis. Pages are refreshed and may be unpublished when evidence becomes stale or unreliable.

See the complete sampling and scoring method