Screen Signals creator assessment

Is Joshua Weissman appropriate for kids?

@joshuaweissman · A parent-focused assessment based on a sample of recent and popular public long-form videos, not a review of every upload.

6 videos analyzed Last analyzed August 18, 2026View channel on YouTube
Scores by age

Age-specific assessment

Choose an age range.

ScreenSignals.ai
93of 100

Joshua Weissman

For ages 8–10

Few concerns found

Nothing concerning came up repeatedly in the videos we reviewed. Educational or thought-provoking material appeared more than once.

High confidence based on 6 videos reviewed
LanguageFew concerns93
Violence & intensityFew concerns100
Sexual or suggestive contentFew concerns100
Substances & risky behaviorFew concerns100
Harassment & role modelingFew concerns90
Fear & disturbing themesFew concerns89
Mature & sensitive topicsFew concerns95
Commercial pressureFew concerns96
Positive things we found
  • Educational or thought-provoking material appeared more than once.
Things a parent may want to know
  • Mentions potential food safety risks, including raw or underheated foods that could cause illness.
  • Includes mild language (a brief mild expletive censored).
  • Shows some foods that are in the temperature danger zone, which may be concerning for sensitive viewers.
  • Discusses the possibility of scams or no-shows when ordering from strangers online.
  • Some gadgets produce lower-quality food or require additional effort, potentially promoting laziness.
Videos reviewed

A quick look at the videos

See the individual videos that shaped this assessment and the main points an adult parent may want to know.

recent · standard video85/100

I Investigated The “Illegal” Food of Facebook Marketplace

Score for ages 8–10 · Few concerns
  • Mentions potential food safety risks, including raw or underheated foods that could cause illness.
  • Includes mild language (a brief mild expletive censored).
  • Shows some foods that are in the temperature danger zone, which may be concerning for sensitive viewers.
recent · standard video87/100

I Tried The Weirdest Restaurants in America

Score for ages 8–10 · Few concerns
  • Contains mild crude humor and some censored mild profanity.
  • Includes a restaurant where servers are intentionally rude and use aggressive language, which might be uncomfortable for sensitive viewers.
  • Some descriptions of food being dry or poorly seasoned might disappoint viewers expecting high culinary standards.
recent · standard video97/100

I Tested America's Worst 1-Star Fast Food

Score for ages 8–10 · Few concerns
  • Some descriptions include references to food contamination concerns (e.g., nails, staples, toothpicks) though these are investigated and often disproved.
  • There are mentions of unpleasant smells and poor food quality in some places.
  • The video includes customer complaints about rude staff and slow service.
popular · standard video97/100

I Tried $1 Street Food Around The World

Score for ages 8–10 · Few concerns
  • Contains mild use of a mild expletive censored in video.
  • Mentions food items with fermentation or curing processes that might be unfamiliar to some viewers.
  • Some descriptions include references to spicy or strong flavors which might be intense for sensitive children.
popular · standard video98/100

I Tested The Laziest Kitchen Gadgets

Score for ages 8–10 · Few concerns
  • Some gadgets produce lower-quality food or require additional effort, potentially promoting laziness.
  • One tool caused a minor injury (mandoline slicer), highlighting safety risks.
  • Some devices are expensive and may not justify their cost or convenience.
popular · standard video97/100

I Tried Every Viral Restaurant in America

Score for ages 8–10 · Few concerns
  • Some mild language of frustration or criticism regarding food quality or waiting times, but no strong profanity.
  • Mentions of food preparation techniques and ingredients that might be unfamiliar to younger children but are not inappropriate.
  • Discussion of expensive food items and waiting in long lines, which might not be relatable to all children.
Read this score correctly

A channel assessment is a starting point, not a guarantee.

The assessment evaluates observable patterns in the sampled videos. It does not cover private or deleted videos, comments, recommendations, livestream behavior, visual-only moments that cannot be reliably identified, or every upload.

Creator-controlled source material is treated only as evidence and cannot instruct or override the analysis. The score reflects the evidence collected on the displayed analysis date and does not update automatically.

See the complete sampling and scoring method