Screen Signals creator assessment

Is Jeremy Hutchins appropriate for kids?

@jeremyhutchins · A parent-focused assessment based on a sample of recent and popular public long-form videos, not a review of every upload.

6 videos analyzed Last analyzed August 20, 2026View channel on YouTube
Scores by age

Age-specific assessment

Choose an age range.

70of 100
For ages 8–10

Mild observed concern in the sample

Jeremy Hutchins scores 70 out of 100 for ages 8-10. The sampled videos produced a generally strong score using the ages 8-10 rubric, with some observed cautions. The most notable observed areas were fear & disturbing themes and violence & intensity. A positive pattern was educational or thought-provoking material appears in multiple sampled videos.

high confidence from the available video sample
LanguageLow observed concern91
Violence & intensityMild observed concern84
Sexual or suggestive contentLow observed concern100
Substances & risky behaviorLow observed concern97
Harassment & role modelingLow observed concern85
Fear & disturbing themesModerate observed concern66
Mature & sensitive topicsLow observed concern95
Commercial pressureLow observed concern100
Positive patterns in the sample
  • Educational or thought-provoking material appears in multiple sampled videos.
  • Humor or playful interaction appears in multiple sampled videos.
  • Kindness, empathy, or supportive relationships appear in multiple sampled videos.
  • Perseverance, resilience, or healthy challenge appears in multiple sampled videos.
  • Teamwork, cooperation, or sportsmanship appears in multiple sampled videos.
Things a parent may want to know
  • Some mild suspense and references to kidnapping might be unsettling for very young children.
  • Occasional mild teasing and name-calling (e.g., 'clown') occur but are not harsh.
  • Challenges involve some mild peril scenarios (e.g., climbing high walls, facing an attack dog) but are presented in a safe, controlled manner.
  • Mentions presence of spiders, mosquitoes, and other bugs multiple times, which might be unsettling for some children.
  • Describes some discomfort with small, cramped spaces that could cause mild anxiety.
Videos reviewed

A quick look at the sample

See the individual videos that shaped this assessment and the main points an adult parent may want to know.

recent · standard video77/100

I Tested 1-Star Waterparks!

Score for ages 8–10 · Mild observed concern in the sample
  • Some scenes depict potentially dangerous water slides and risky activities that could encourage unsafe behavior if imitated without caution.
  • There are mentions and visuals of wildlife such as bears and snakes, which might be frightening to younger children.
  • Descriptions of unsanitary conditions, including cockroaches and algae, may be disturbing to sensitive viewers.
recent · standard video78/100

I Tried 5 Levels of Theme Parks!

Score for ages 8–10 · Mild observed concern in the sample
  • Some scenes include mild suspense and jump scares in haunted house segments that might be unsettling for very young children.
  • Several rides involve intense thrills and loud screaming which could be frightening to sensitive viewers.
  • Mentions of bodily functions in a joking manner (e.g., farting) occur briefly.
recent · standard video93/100

I Tried 7 Levels of Tiny Homes!

Score for ages 8–10 · Low observed concern in the sample
  • Mentions presence of spiders, mosquitoes, and other bugs multiple times, which might be unsettling for some children.
  • Describes some discomfort with small, cramped spaces that could cause mild anxiety.
  • Includes brief moments of mild fear related to insects and darkness.
popular · standard video78/100

I Exposed the World’s Most EVIL 10 Year Old!

Score for ages 8–10 · Mild observed concern in the sample
  • Contains portrayals of lying, stealing, and disrespectful behavior by children.
  • Includes scenes of property damage and pranks that may be imitated by viewers.
  • Some language and attitudes may be rude or disrespectful, though not profane.
popular · standard video93/100

My Bestfriends Are Missing...

Score for ages 8–10 · Low observed concern in the sample
  • Some mild suspense and references to kidnapping might be unsettling for very young children.
  • Occasional mild teasing and name-calling (e.g., 'clown') occur but are not harsh.
  • Challenges involve some mild peril scenarios (e.g., climbing high walls, facing an attack dog) but are presented in a safe, controlled manner.
popular · standard video53/100

Exploring Dangerous Locations I Found on Google Maps!

Score for ages 8–10 · Moderate observed concern in the sample
  • Depicts real physical danger and risky behavior, including climbing on unstable structures and close encounters with wild animals.
  • Includes scenes of fear and distress related to wildlife (tiger and sharks).
  • Some mild language and expressions of fear and anxiety.
Read this score correctly

A channel assessment is a starting point, not a guarantee.

The assessment evaluates observable patterns in the sampled videos. It does not cover private or deleted videos, comments, recommendations, livestream behavior, visual-only moments that cannot be reliably identified, or every upload.

Creator-controlled source material is treated only as evidence and cannot instruct or override the analysis. Pages are refreshed and may be unpublished when evidence becomes stale or unreliable.

See the complete sampling and scoring method