Screen Signals creator assessment

Is Jake Webber appropriate for kids?

@jakewebber9 · A parent-focused assessment based on a sample of recent and popular public long-form videos, not a review of every upload.

12 videos analyzed Last analyzed August 20, 2026View channel on YouTube
Scores by age

Age-specific assessment

Choose an age range.

ScreenSignals.ai
77of 100

Jake Webber

For ages 8–10

A few concerns to review

The main things to review are substances and risky behavior, and language. Humor or playful interaction appeared more than once.

High confidence based on 12 videos reviewed
LanguageA few concerns75
Violence & intensityFew concerns96
Sexual or suggestive contentA few concerns80
Substances & risky behaviorA few concerns73
Harassment & role modelingFew concerns95
Fear & disturbing themesFew concerns95
Mature & sensitive topicsFew concerns91
Commercial pressureFew concerns95
Positive things we found
  • Humor or playful interaction appeared more than once.
  • Kindness, empathy, or supportive relationships appeared more than once.
  • Educational or thought-provoking material appeared more than once.
  • Creativity, imagination, or constructive problem-solving appeared more than once.
Things a parent may want to know
  • Some mild crude and suggestive language is present.
  • There are references to bodily functions and physical appearance that may be uncomfortable for some children.
  • Mild sexual suggestiveness occurs in joking about body parts and clothing.
  • Casual mention of alcohol and partying is included.
  • Frequent use of crude and sexualized language (e.g., 'splooge', references to genitalia).
Videos reviewed

A quick look at the videos

See the individual videos that shaped this assessment and the main points an adult parent may want to know.

recent · standard video76/100

crashing tara's birthday

Score for ages 8–10 · A few concerns
  • Some mild crude and suggestive language is present.
  • There are references to bodily functions and physical appearance that may be uncomfortable for some children.
  • Mild sexual suggestiveness occurs in joking about body parts and clothing.
recent · standard video77/100

We Went to the Fair!

Score for ages 8–10 · A few concerns
  • Frequent references to alcohol consumption and desire for drinking, including underage implications.
  • Use of mild profanity and crude language throughout The video.
  • Some sexual innuendo and suggestive jokes are present.
recent · standard video75/100

The Aftermath of Our Party..

Score for ages 8–10 · A few concerns
  • Frequent use of crude and sexualized language (e.g., 'splooge', references to genitalia).
  • Mentions of bodily fluids, infections, and unsanitary conditions in a casual, joking manner.
  • Mild profanity and slang throughout The video.
recent · standard video50/100

even the police came to my pool party!

Score for ages 8–10 · Some concerns
  • Frequent use of mild to moderate profanity throughout the video.
  • Multiple references to alcohol consumption and intoxication.
  • Some crude humor and bodily function jokes.
recent · standard video75/100

Dark Web Shopping Spree

Score for ages 8–10 · A few concerns
  • Contains mild sexual innuendo and crude humor related to body parts and functions.
  • Some language and jokes may be inappropriate for younger children.
  • References to bodily functions and mild gross-out humor may be off-putting to sensitive viewers.
popular · standard video93/100

Oliver Tree Took My Credit Card

Score for ages 8–10 · Few concerns
  • Mild crude humor including references to bodily functions and odors.
  • Some mild language with occasional mild profanity censored.
  • Discussion of personal hygiene issues including fungal infections and body odor.
popular · standard video76/100

Turning Oliver Tree Emo

Score for ages 8–10 · A few concerns
  • Frequent mild profanity is used throughout the video.
  • There is a joking mention of using energy drinks to disinfect wounds, which is misleading and potentially risky.
  • Some references to piercings and body modifications might require parental guidance for younger viewers.
popular · standard video74/100

I Threw a Birthday Party!

Score for ages 8–10 · A few concerns
  • Frequent use of mild to moderate profanity
  • References to alcohol consumption and drinking games
  • Some crude and suggestive humor that may be inappropriate for younger children
popular · standard video84/100

Catching Snakes with Rob Rausch!

Score for ages 8–10 · A few concerns
  • Contains mild profanity and crude humor.
  • Includes alcohol consumption and drinking games.
  • Shows handling and shooting firearms, which may require adult supervision.
popular · standard video76/100

A Bromantic Vegas Getaway

Score for ages 8–10 · A few concerns
  • Frequent use of mild to moderate profanity (e.g., 'idiot sandwich', '[expletive]').
  • References to alcohol consumption and partying (e.g., Red Bull vodka, chugging drinks).
  • Some crude humor and bodily function references (e.g., 'biggest dump', 'Hello shitty').
popular · standard video76/100

Fellas in Paris

Score for ages 8–10 · A few concerns
  • Frequent casual references to alcohol consumption and smoking
  • Some crude humor and mild profanity
  • Mentions of bodily functions and some crude jokes
popular · standard video76/100

I BOUGHT A NEW CAR!

Score for ages 8–10 · A few concerns
  • Mild profanity is present throughout The video.
  • Mentions smoking and difficulty quitting, which is a mature theme though not detailed.
  • Brief mention of a disease exposure (Legionnaires' disease) in a joking manner, which might be confusing or concerning to younger viewers.
Read this score correctly

A channel assessment is a starting point, not a guarantee.

The assessment evaluates observable patterns in the sampled videos. It does not cover private or deleted videos, comments, recommendations, livestream behavior, visual-only moments that cannot be reliably identified, or every upload.

Creator-controlled source material is treated only as evidence and cannot instruct or override the analysis. The score reflects the evidence collected on the displayed analysis date and does not update automatically.

See the complete sampling and scoring method