Screen Signals creator assessment

Is Film Cooper appropriate for kids?

@filmcooper · A parent-focused assessment based on a sample of recent and popular public long-form videos, not a review of every upload.

12 videos analyzed Last analyzed August 20, 2026View channel on YouTube
Scores by age

Age-specific assessment

Choose an age range.

22of 100
For ages 8–10

Very high observed concern in the sample

Film Cooper scores 22 out of 100 for ages 8-10. The sampled videos produced a very low score using the ages 8-10 rubric because of the observed concern patterns. The most notable observed areas were mature & sensitive topics and harassment & role modeling. A positive pattern was educational or thought-provoking material appears in multiple sampled videos.

high confidence from the available video sample
LanguageModerate observed concern55
Violence & intensityLow observed concern88
Sexual or suggestive contentHigh observed concern46
Substances & risky behaviorMild observed concern84
Harassment & role modelingHigh observed concern30
Fear & disturbing themesModerate observed concern68
Mature & sensitive topicsVery high observed concern18
Commercial pressureLow observed concern91
Positive patterns in the sample
  • Educational or thought-provoking material appears in multiple sampled videos.
  • Humor or playful interaction appears in multiple sampled videos.
  • Kindness, empathy, or supportive relationships appear in multiple sampled videos.
Things a parent may want to know
  • Mentions of underage girls in a joking context, which may be concerning.
  • Awkward sexual innuendo and self-flirtation that could be uncomfortable for some viewers.
  • References to social awkwardness and potential mental health concerns in the creator's behavior.
  • The video contains strong personal judgments and condescending language towards the creator.
  • There are references to cult involvement and alleged harassment without detailed evidence in The video.
Videos reviewed

A quick look at the sample

See the individual videos that shaped this assessment and the main points an adult parent may want to know.

recent · standard video73/100

The Most Embarrassing Man on the Internet

Score for ages 8–10 · Mild observed concern in the sample
  • Mentions of underage girls in a joking context, which may be concerning.
  • Awkward sexual innuendo and self-flirtation that could be uncomfortable for some viewers.
  • References to social awkwardness and potential mental health concerns in the creator's behavior.
recent · standard video46/100

The 'Unschooling Mom' Has Gotten SO MUCH WORSE

Score for ages 8–10 · High observed concern in the sample
  • The video contains strong personal judgments and condescending language towards the creator.
  • There are references to cult involvement and alleged harassment without detailed evidence in The video.
  • The tone can be sarcastic and mocking, which might be unsettling for some viewers.
recent · standard video22/100

The TikTok Ex-Boyfriend Who Lied About EVERYTHING

Score for ages 8–10 · Very high observed concern in the sample
  • The video contains descriptions of stalking and manipulative behaviors that may be distressing to some viewers.
  • There are references to emotional abuse and privacy violations, which could be sensitive topics.
  • Some language is informal and includes mild profanity, which may not be suitable for very young children.
recent · standard video4/100

They Made a WHOLESOME Sitcom About HITLER...

Score for ages 8–10 · Very high observed concern in the sample
  • The content discusses highly sensitive and disturbing topics including the Holocaust and Nazi ideology in a comedic context, which may be upsetting to some viewers.
  • There is frequent use of sarcastic and critical language about the sitcom's portrayal of Hitler, which may be confusing without proper historical knowledge.
  • The video includes references to offensive stereotypes and antisemitic characterizations present in the sitcom, which are described but not endorsed by the video creator.
recent · standard video70/100

The WORST Wedding Dress Designer on TikTok

Score for ages 8–10 · Mild observed concern in the sample
  • Strong language and some mild profanity are present throughout The video.
  • The content includes detailed descriptions of a stressful and disappointing consumer experience, which may be upsetting to some viewers.
  • There is discussion of business disputes and accusations of poor workmanship and dishonesty, which may be complex for younger viewers to understand.
popular · standard video22/100

The Most INSUFFERABLE Guy On TikTok

Score for ages 8–10 · Very high observed concern in the sample
  • Discusses allegations of abuse (biting) related to Wilbur Soot, which may be sensitive for some viewers.
  • Contains mature social topics including stalking, obsession, and cultural appropriation.
  • Mentions mental health concerns related to parasocial obsession and delusional thinking.
popular · standard video4/100

The OBSESSIVE TikTok Teacher FROM HELL

Score for ages 8–10 · Very high observed concern in the sample
  • The video contains explicit references to sexual grooming and illegal sexual activity involving a minor.
  • There is frequent use of strong language and derogatory terms directed at the accused.
  • The content discusses substance use and providing alcohol to minors.
popular · standard video43/100

The Oversharing Bully Who Thinks She's the Victim

Score for ages 8–10 · High observed concern in the sample
  • The video contains frequent strong language and profanity, which may be inappropriate for younger viewers.
  • There are references to personal trauma and abusive relationships, though not graphically described, which may be sensitive for some audiences.
  • The tone is often sarcastic and critical, which might be perceived as harsh or bullying in itself.
popular · standard video4/100

James Charles is BACK and SO MUCH WORSE

Score for ages 8–10 · Very high observed concern in the sample
  • Contains explicit references to sexual misconduct and grooming of minors.
  • Includes strong and profane language throughout The video.
  • Discusses real-world allegations of abuse and illegal behavior in detail.
popular · standard video22/100

The Erika Kirk MELTDOWN

Score for ages 8–10 · Very high observed concern in the sample
  • Contains political and ideological commentary that may be sensitive or polarizing.
  • Includes references to conspiracy theories and controversial public figures.
  • Mentions a leaked private moment and financial details that may be sensitive.
popular · standard video4/100

Gabbie Hanna is a Manipulative Gaslighting SUPER VILLAIN

Score for ages 8–10 · Very high observed concern in the sample
  • Contains discussions of serious allegations including sexual assault and harassment.
  • Includes strong language and derogatory terms, though mostly paraphrased or censored.
  • Describes mental health struggles and substance use issues in vulnerable individuals.
popular · standard video43/100

When Entitled Influencers RUIN Their Own Careers

Score for ages 8–10 · High observed concern in the sample
  • Contains frequent strong language and profanity, which may be inappropriate for younger viewers.
  • Includes portrayals of public shaming and harsh criticism of individuals, which might be distressing or uncomfortable.
  • Discusses legal threats and interpersonal conflicts among influencers, which may be complex for younger audiences to understand.
Read this score correctly

A channel assessment is a starting point, not a guarantee.

The assessment evaluates observable patterns in the sampled videos. It does not cover private or deleted videos, comments, recommendations, livestream behavior, visual-only moments that cannot be reliably identified, or every upload.

Creator-controlled source material is treated only as evidence and cannot instruct or override the analysis. Pages are refreshed and may be unpublished when evidence becomes stale or unreliable.

See the complete sampling and scoring method