Screen Signals creator assessment

Is Cleetus McFarland appropriate for kids?

@cleetusm · A parent-focused assessment based on a sample of recent and popular public long-form videos, not a review of every upload.

6 videos analyzed Last analyzed August 21, 2026View channel on YouTube
Scores by age

Age-specific assessment

Choose an age range.

ScreenSignals.ai
76of 100

Cleetus McFarland

For ages 8–10

A few concerns to review

The main things to review are commercial pressure, and violence and intensity. Educational or thought-provoking material appeared more than once.

High confidence based on 6 videos reviewed
LanguageFew concerns91
Violence & intensityA few concerns83
Sexual or suggestive contentFew concerns100
Substances & risky behaviorFew concerns100
Harassment & role modelingFew concerns97
Fear & disturbing themesFew concerns89
Mature & sensitive topicsFew concerns95
Commercial pressureA few concerns72
Positive things we found
  • Educational or thought-provoking material appeared more than once.
  • Kindness, empathy, or supportive relationships appeared more than once.
  • Teamwork, cooperation, or sportsmanship appeared more than once.
  • Perseverance, resilience, or healthy challenge appeared more than once.
Things a parent may want to know
  • Mild language and expressions of frustration are present.
  • Some scenes involve car driving and minor reckless behavior (e.g., backing up awkwardly, missed turns).
  • The car's mechanical issues and negative review might be disappointing or confusing to younger viewers.
  • The video includes a sponsored segment promoting mental health therapy, which is positive but may be complex for younger children.
  • Some mild commercial pressure through multiple mentions of merchandise and giveaways.
Videos reviewed

A quick look at the videos

See the individual videos that shaped this assessment and the main points an adult parent may want to know.

recent · standard video78/100

I Was Born For This!

Score for ages 8–10 · A few concerns
  • Some mild commercial pressure through multiple mentions of merchandise and giveaways.
  • Mentions of stress and mental health topics, though presented positively and non-graphically.
  • Provides insight into dirt late model racing and car handling techniques.
recent · standard video70/100

The Week of Destruction... Charger EV and Late Model WRECKED!

Score for ages 8–10 · A few concerns
  • There is mild peril related to car crashes and vehicle damage, which might be intense for very young children.
  • Some casual language and mild slang are used, but no strong profanity.
  • Promotional content and giveaways are present, which may influence viewers commercially.
recent · standard video78/100

I Wrecked a $300,000 Sand Car…

Score for ages 8–10 · A few concerns
  • Contains scenes of vehicle crashes and mechanical failures which might be intense for very young children.
  • Some mild casual language and exclamations are present.
  • The video includes commercial promotion which might influence viewers.
popular · standard video86/100

Cheap Boat Challenge Part 3 - Ended Terribly Wrong

Score for ages 8–10 · Few concerns
  • Contains mild language and casual insults among participants.
  • Depicts real accidents resulting in injuries, including a black eye and cuts.
  • Shows risky activities like testing homemade boats on water, which may be imitable by children without supervision.
popular · standard video81/100

We Bought The Worst Car in America!

Score for ages 8–10 · A few concerns
  • Mild language and expressions of frustration are present.
  • Some scenes involve car driving and minor reckless behavior (e.g., backing up awkwardly, missed turns).
  • The car's mechanical issues and negative review might be disappointing or confusing to younger viewers.
popular · standard video81/100

Cheap Racecar Challenge Ep.7 - The Sideways Turbo Disaster... Jackstand's 240 Is Alive!!!

Score for ages 8–10 · A few concerns
  • Contains some mild crude humor and casual language.
  • Mentions mechanical failures and car damage which might be concerning to sensitive viewers.
  • Some technical jargon may be confusing for younger children.
Read this score correctly

A channel assessment is a starting point, not a guarantee.

The assessment evaluates observable patterns in the sampled videos. It does not cover private or deleted videos, comments, recommendations, livestream behavior, visual-only moments that cannot be reliably identified, or every upload.

Creator-controlled source material is treated only as evidence and cannot instruct or override the analysis. The score reflects the evidence collected on the displayed analysis date and does not update automatically.

See the complete sampling and scoring method