Screen Signals creator assessment

Is Cleansey appropriate for kids?

@cleansey · A parent-focused assessment based on a sample of recent and popular public long-form videos, not a review of every upload.

12 videos analyzed Last analyzed August 20, 2026View channel on YouTube
Scores by age

Age-specific assessment

Choose an age range.

78of 100
For ages 8–10

Mild observed concern in the sample

Cleansey scores 78 out of 100 for ages 8-10. The sampled videos produced a generally strong score using the ages 8-10 rubric, with some observed cautions. The most notable observed areas were fear & disturbing themes and violence & intensity. A positive pattern was perseverance, resilience, or healthy challenge appears in multiple sampled videos.

high confidence from the available video sample
LanguageLow observed concern92
Violence & intensityMild observed concern80
Sexual or suggestive contentLow observed concern100
Substances & risky behaviorLow observed concern100
Harassment & role modelingMild observed concern82
Fear & disturbing themesMild observed concern74
Mature & sensitive topicsLow observed concern96
Commercial pressureMild observed concern82
Positive patterns in the sample
  • Perseverance, resilience, or healthy challenge appears in multiple sampled videos.
  • Humor or playful interaction appears in multiple sampled videos.
  • Teamwork, cooperation, or sportsmanship appears in multiple sampled videos.
  • Educational or thought-provoking material appears in multiple sampled videos.
Things a parent may want to know
  • The video includes mild language such as 'loser' and some informal slang that might be slightly negative for younger children.
  • There is mild in-game violence depicted as part of the Murder Mystery 2 gameplay, including references to 'murderer' and 'eliminations,' though it is cartoonish and typical of the game.
  • The video discusses hacking and scamming, which might be unsettling or confusing for very young children.
  • There is some mild peer pressure implied by the repeated requests to like and subscribe to get 'free stuff.'
  • The video includes references to the number 666 and associates it with evil, which may be unsettling or confusing for younger children.
Videos reviewed

A quick look at the sample

See the individual videos that shaped this assessment and the main points an adult parent may want to know.

recent · standard video92/100

DO NOT ACCEPT THIS FRIEND REQUEST!

Score for ages 8–10 · Low observed concern in the sample
  • The video includes mild language such as 'loser' and some informal slang that might be slightly negative for younger children.
  • There is mild in-game violence depicted as part of the Murder Mystery 2 gameplay, including references to 'murderer' and 'eliminations,' though it is cartoonish and typical of the game.
  • The video discusses hacking and scamming, which might be unsettling or confusing for very young children.
recent · standard video76/100

Everyone Is Getting These FRIEND REQUESTS on ROBLOX...

Score for ages 8–10 · Mild observed concern in the sample
  • The video includes references to the number 666 and associates it with evil, which may be unsettling or confusing for younger children.
  • There is mild fear-inducing content related to hacking and 'creepy' friend requests, which might cause anxiety in sensitive viewers.
  • The video depicts in-game violence typical of Murder Mystery 2, including eliminations and murder gameplay, though not graphically described.
recent · standard video36/100

DO NOT FRIEND THIS ROBLOX PLAYER!

Score for ages 8–10 · High observed concern in the sample
  • The video contains themes of stalking and fear which may be unsettling for younger children.
  • Repeated references to the number 666 and evil or supernatural concepts may be disturbing or confusing to some children.
  • The narrative includes warnings about 'possible raid warnings' and error codes, which could cause anxiety or fear.
recent · standard video93/100

Testing RIVALS Codes for SKIN CASES!

Score for ages 8–10 · Low observed concern in the sample
  • Some mild language includes insults like 'trash bot' and 'garbage man' used in a playful but potentially negative way.
  • There is in-game competitive banter that includes mild taunting and name-calling.
  • The video involves a lot of repetitive clicking and jumping actions that might be tedious for some viewers.
recent · standard video92/100

Rivals Code Gives SECRET SKIN CASE?

Score for ages 8–10 · Low observed concern in the sample
  • The video involves a lot of in-game actions that might be confusing or frustrating for younger children to follow.
  • There is some mild teasing and name-calling (e.g., 'hater', 'Karen'), which is light but could be noted by sensitive viewers.
  • The video discusses a potentially fake or misleading code, which might encourage children to spend time on unproductive or deceptive content.
popular · standard video78/100

Pretending To Be a NOOB with CYBORG in 99 Nights!

Score for ages 8–10 · Mild observed concern in the sample
  • The video includes mild insults and name-calling among players, which might model teasing behavior.
  • There is some depiction of in-game combat and use of weapons like a cyborg cannon and shotgun, though in a fantasy context.
  • Players experience social exclusion and bullying within the game, which could be distressing for sensitive children.
popular · standard video93/100

Pretending To Be a NOOB with VAMPIRE in 99 Nights!

Score for ages 8–10 · Low observed concern in the sample
  • There is mild verbal teasing and name-calling among players, including terms like 'noob', 'loser', 'skinny legs', and references to being homeless, which may be perceived as bullying or negative social interaction.
  • Some in-game challenges involve fighting creatures and dodging attacks, which may be mildly intense for very young children.
  • The player uses some slang and informal language that might be unfamiliar to younger viewers.
popular · standard video77/100

Pretending To Be a NOOB With DIVINE BRAINROTS!

Score for ages 8–10 · Mild observed concern in the sample
  • Contains mild bullying and name-calling such as 'dumb noob', 'stinky', and 'brainless'.
  • Includes examples of scamming and manipulation attempts in trades between players.
  • Some competitive taunting and insults are present, which may model negative social behavior.
popular · standard video76/100

LEAVE after DAY 5 in Christmas 99 Nights in the Forest!

Score for ages 8–10 · Mild observed concern in the sample
  • The game includes mild cartoonish violence such as characters dying and being chased by wolves and bears, which may be scary for very young children.
  • There is some mild peril and survival themes including hunger and threats from animals and entities.
  • The video contains commercial pressure through affiliate links and sponsorship disclosures, which may influence children to make purchases or engage with promoted content.
popular · standard video77/100

RUN If You SEE a MESSAGE From THIS ROBLOX PLAYER!

Score for ages 8–10 · Mild observed concern in the sample
  • Mentions hacking and scary messages which might frighten younger children.
  • Includes mild fear-inducing content related to a fictional hacker character.
  • Contains brief casual language and laughter that may be confusing without context.
popular · standard video77/100

Pretending To Be a NOOB with ASSASSIN in 99 Nights!

Score for ages 8–10 · Mild observed concern in the sample
  • Contains mild name-calling and teasing among players (e.g., 'useless noob', 'loser').
  • Includes fantasy combat with wolves, bears, and cultists, which may be mildly intense for younger children.
  • Some social conflict and exclusion behavior is depicted (e.g., being kicked out of base).
popular · standard video78/100

Rivals CODE GIVES GLAST SHARD SKIN?

Score for ages 8–10 · Mild observed concern in the sample
  • Mentions game lag and connectivity issues which may frustrate younger players.
  • Contains competitive gaming scenarios that may include mild in-game conflict but no real violence.
  • Some mild frustration and informal language typical of gaming commentary.
Read this score correctly

A channel assessment is a starting point, not a guarantee.

The assessment evaluates observable patterns in the sampled videos. It does not cover private or deleted videos, comments, recommendations, livestream behavior, visual-only moments that cannot be reliably identified, or every upload.

Creator-controlled source material is treated only as evidence and cannot instruct or override the analysis. Pages are refreshed and may be unpublished when evidence becomes stale or unreliable.

See the complete sampling and scoring method