Screen Signals creator assessment

Is ChrisMD appropriate for kids?

@chrismd10 · A parent-focused assessment based on a sample of recent and popular public long-form videos, not a review of every upload.

12 videos analyzed Last analyzed August 18, 2026View channel on YouTube
Scores by age

Age-specific assessment

Choose an age range.

48of 100
For ages 8–10

High observed concern in the sample

ChrisMD scores 48 out of 100 for ages 8-10. The sampled videos produced a low score using the ages 8-10 rubric because of the observed concern patterns. The most notable observed areas were substances & risky behavior and language. A positive pattern was humor or playful interaction appears in multiple sampled videos.

high confidence from the available video sample
LanguageMild observed concern75
Violence & intensityLow observed concern96
Sexual or suggestive contentLow observed concern96
Substances & risky behaviorHigh observed concern44
Harassment & role modelingLow observed concern93
Fear & disturbing themesLow observed concern99
Mature & sensitive topicsLow observed concern96
Commercial pressureMild observed concern82
Positive patterns in the sample
  • Humor or playful interaction appears in multiple sampled videos.
  • Teamwork, cooperation, or sportsmanship appears in multiple sampled videos.
  • Educational or thought-provoking material appears in multiple sampled videos.
Things a parent may want to know
  • Contains mild informal language and slang.
  • Includes a commercial promotion segment.
  • Some mild physical discomfort references (e.g., ankle injury) but no serious harm.
  • Contains frequent mild to moderate swearing (e.g., 'f***', 's***') which may be unsuitable for younger children.
  • Some teasing and banter that could be perceived as mild harassment or rude language.
Videos reviewed

A quick look at the sample

See the individual videos that shaped this assessment and the main points an adult parent may want to know.

recent · standard video96/100

We Recreated the World Cup’s Most Satisfying Goals

Score for ages 8–10 · Low observed concern in the sample
  • Contains mild informal language and slang.
  • Includes a commercial promotion segment.
  • Some mild physical discomfort references (e.g., ankle injury) but no serious harm.
recent · standard video76/100

Last to Miss Penalty Wins World Cup Final Ticket

Score for ages 8–10 · Mild observed concern in the sample
  • Contains frequent mild to moderate swearing (e.g., 'f***', 's***') which may be unsuitable for younger children.
  • Some teasing and banter that could be perceived as mild harassment or rude language.
  • References to drinking milk humorously but no actual substance use shown or promoted.
recent · standard video4/100

FOOTBALL PUB GOLF: AUSTRALIA EDITION

Score for ages 8–10 · Very high observed concern in the sample
  • Frequent use of mild to moderate coarse language and slang.
  • Repeated depiction of alcohol consumption and drinking games.
  • Some physical roughhousing including biting and hitting, though not severe.
recent · standard video50/100

Scoring 1 AMAZING Goal DRUNK vs SOBER

Score for ages 8–10 · Moderate observed concern in the sample
  • Contains frequent mild profanity and crude language.
  • Includes references to alcohol consumption and a drinking game.
  • Some humor may be inappropriate for younger children due to language and drinking context.
recent · standard video78/100

1 Fan From Every Champions League Club Competes For $10,000

Score for ages 8–10 · Mild observed concern in the sample
  • Contains mild strong language and casual swearing occasionally.
  • Some competitive banter includes light insults and teasing.
  • Mentions of injuries and physical challenges in a sports context.
popular · standard video76/100

Every Time You Score, the Keeper Gets Upgraded

Score for ages 8–10 · Mild observed concern in the sample
  • Contains mild profanity and crude language occasionally.
  • Some playful insults and teasing that might be inappropriate for very young children.
  • References to bodily functions and mild crude humor.
popular · standard video53/100

NORTH vs SOUTH Football Challenges

Score for ages 8–10 · Moderate observed concern in the sample
  • Contains moderate use of mild profanity and crude language.
  • Includes consumption of alcoholic beverages as part of the challenges.
  • Some teasing and mild insults among participants, though mostly in good humor.
popular · standard video78/100

Every Time You Score, the Defender Gets Upgraded

Score for ages 8–10 · Mild observed concern in the sample
  • Mild strong language (several uses of mild profanity).
  • Some teasing and mild insults among participants, though mostly in a playful context.
  • Commercial promotion and job recruitment content embedded in the video.
popular · standard video81/100

Free Kicks vs the Best Free Kick Taker in the World

Score for ages 8–10 · Mild observed concern in the sample
  • Contains mild language with some mild profanity censored or implied.
  • Includes some competitive teasing and banter that might be misunderstood by very young children.
  • Promotional content for a paid app and merchandise is present, which may influence children to want to purchase products.
popular · standard video78/100

Scoring 1 AMAZING Goal with Every Technique

Score for ages 8–10 · Mild observed concern in the sample
  • Mild crude language and occasional swearing
  • Some teasing and name-calling among participants
  • Brief references to drinking and hydration product promotion
popular · standard video78/100

1 Footballer from Every Position Competes for £10,000

Score for ages 8–10 · Mild observed concern in the sample
  • Contains mild profanity and occasional crude language.
  • Some competitive banter may include teasing or mild insults.
  • Occasional references to bodily functions and crude humor.
popular · standard video4/100

FOOTBALL PUB GOLF

Score for ages 8–10 · Very high observed concern in the sample
  • The video depicts heavy alcohol consumption and intoxication, including vomiting and stumbling.
  • There is use of mild crude language and some derogatory terms.
  • Some participants engage in risky behavior such as drinking shots rapidly and physical pranks.
Read this score correctly

A channel assessment is a starting point, not a guarantee.

The assessment evaluates observable patterns in the sampled videos. It does not cover private or deleted videos, comments, recommendations, livestream behavior, visual-only moments that cannot be reliably identified, or every upload.

Creator-controlled source material is treated only as evidence and cannot instruct or override the analysis. Pages are refreshed and may be unpublished when evidence becomes stale or unreliable.

See the complete sampling and scoring method