Screen Signals creator assessment

Is Beau Miles appropriate for kids?

@beaumiles · A parent-focused assessment based on a sample of recent and popular public long-form videos, not a review of every upload.

6 videos analyzed Last analyzed August 20, 2026View channel on YouTube
Scores by age

Age-specific assessment

Choose an age range.

94of 100
For ages 8–10

Low observed concern in the sample

Beau Miles scores 94 out of 100 for ages 8-10. The sampled videos produced a high score using the ages 8-10 rubric, with relatively few observed concerns. The sampled videos did not show a recurring high-concern pattern. A positive pattern was humor or playful interaction appears in multiple sampled videos.

high confidence from the available video sample
LanguageLow observed concern90
Violence & intensityLow observed concern100
Sexual or suggestive contentLow observed concern95
Substances & risky behaviorLow observed concern92
Harassment & role modelingLow observed concern100
Fear & disturbing themesLow observed concern94
Mature & sensitive topicsLow observed concern93
Commercial pressureLow observed concern96
Positive patterns in the sample
  • Humor or playful interaction appears in multiple sampled videos.
  • Kindness, empathy, or supportive relationships appear in multiple sampled videos.
Things a parent may want to know
  • Mild profanity and casual use of slang terms.
  • References to potentially risky items like used condoms and cigarette butts.
  • Some discussion of bodily fluids and hygiene risks.
  • Mild commercial pressure to buy tickets for the film tour.
  • Mentions the presence of dingoes and potential wildlife risks.
Videos reviewed

A quick look at the sample

See the individual videos that shaped this assessment and the main points an adult parent may want to know.

recent · standard video96/100

Being Bad at Something Never Felt So Good

Score for ages 8–10 · Low observed concern in the sample
  • Mild casual language including mild profanity and slang.
  • References to alcohol consumption and related litter.
  • Some brief mention of unpleasant smells and dirty items.
recent · standard video96/100

Raising Our Junk Cottage From the Mud

Score for ages 8–10 · Low observed concern in the sample
  • Mentions the presence of dingoes and potential wildlife risks.
  • Describes physical labor and use of tools that may require adult supervision.
  • Includes some mild language and informal speech.
recent · standard video92/100

Learning to love a filthy habit

Score for ages 8–10 · Low observed concern in the sample
  • Mild profanity and casual use of slang terms.
  • References to potentially risky items like used condoms and cigarette butts.
  • Some discussion of bodily fluids and hygiene risks.
popular · standard video92/100

Travelling America With One Rule: Eat Only At Diners

Score for ages 8–10 · Low observed concern in the sample
  • Mild coarse language and informal speech present
  • Some references to bodily functions in a humorous context
  • Mentions of alcohol consumption in social settings
popular · standard video96/100

I Bought The Worst House I Could Afford

Score for ages 8–10 · Low observed concern in the sample
  • Mentions hazardous conditions like mold, dust, and termite damage which may be unsettling.
  • Contains mild coarse language and casual humor that may be inappropriate for very young children.
  • Discusses structural decay and pest infestations which could be disturbing to sensitive viewers.
popular · standard video94/100

I planted a forest four years ago

Score for ages 8–10 · Low observed concern in the sample
  • Mentions presence of venomous snakes which may concern sensitive viewers.
  • Some mild informal language and casual speech.
  • References to smoking and fire use in a natural setting.
Read this score correctly

A channel assessment is a starting point, not a guarantee.

The assessment evaluates observable patterns in the sampled videos. It does not cover private or deleted videos, comments, recommendations, livestream behavior, visual-only moments that cannot be reliably identified, or every upload.

Creator-controlled source material is treated only as evidence and cannot instruct or override the analysis. Pages are refreshed and may be unpublished when evidence becomes stale or unreliable.

See the complete sampling and scoring method