Screen Signals creator assessment

Is Anna McNulty appropriate for kids?

@annamcnulty · A parent-focused assessment based on a sample of recent and popular public long-form videos, not a review of every upload.

6 videos analyzed Last analyzed August 20, 2026View channel on YouTube
Scores by age

Age-specific assessment

Choose an age range.

ScreenSignals.ai
88of 100

Anna McNulty

For ages 8–10

Few concerns found

The main thing to review is commercial pressure. Teamwork, cooperation, or sportsmanship appeared more than once.

High confidence based on 6 videos reviewed
LanguageFew concerns100
Violence & intensityFew concerns100
Sexual or suggestive contentFew concerns100
Substances & risky behaviorFew concerns100
Harassment & role modelingFew concerns100
Fear & disturbing themesFew concerns95
Mature & sensitive topicsFew concerns96
Commercial pressureA few concerns84
Positive things we found
  • Teamwork, cooperation, or sportsmanship appeared more than once.
  • Perseverance, resilience, or healthy challenge appeared more than once.
  • Creativity, imagination, or constructive problem-solving appeared more than once.
  • Kindness, empathy, or supportive relationships appeared more than once.
Things a parent may want to know
  • Some mild peril is present as the participants try to avoid being caught while hiding and sneaking around.
  • There is some mild physical challenge and risk of minor injury inherent in cheerleading moves, but no actual harm is shown.
  • Some mild suspense as the protagonist hides to avoid being caught.
  • Competitive elements that might cause mild tension but are resolved positively.
  • Some challenges involve physical risk typical of gymnastics, which may require adult supervision for children attempting similar activities.
Videos reviewed

A quick look at the videos

See the individual videos that shaped this assessment and the main points an adult parent may want to know.

recent · standard video96/100

I Secretly Lived in a Cheer Gym

Score for ages 8–10 · Few concerns
  • Some mild peril is present as the participants try to avoid being caught while hiding and sneaking around.
  • There is some mild physical challenge and risk of minor injury inherent in cheerleading moves, but no actual harm is shown.
  • The video promotes physical activity through cheerleading and gymnastics skills.
recent · standard video97/100

Mini Me vs World's Best Gymnast

Score for ages 8–10 · Few concerns
  • Some challenges involve physical risk typical of gymnastics, which may require adult supervision for children attempting similar activities.
  • Promotes physical activity and gymnastics skills.
  • Encourages friendly competition and teamwork.
recent · standard video98/100

Last To Leave My Gymnastics Gym Keeps It!

Score for ages 8–10 · Few concerns
  • Some challenges involve physical exertion that might be difficult for very young children to replicate safely without supervision.
  • The competitive elimination format might cause mild disappointment for some viewers.
  • Promotes physical activity and gymnastics skills.
popular · standard video98/100

I Secretly Lived in a Gymnastics Gym

Score for ages 8–10 · Few concerns
  • Some mild suspense as the protagonist hides to avoid being caught.
  • Competitive elements that might cause mild tension but are resolved positively.
  • Promotes physical activity and gymnastics skills.
popular · standard video78/100

My Home Gymnastics Gym Was Stolen!

Score for ages 8–10 · A few concerns
  • Some mild suspense related to the theft mystery, but no real danger.
  • Brief mention of a theft scenario which might confuse very young children.
  • Includes a product promotion that may influence viewers.
popular · standard video96/100

I Tested BANNED Gymnastics Products!

Score for ages 8–10 · Few concerns
  • Some products are banned for fairness or safety reasons, which is explained but might confuse younger viewers.
  • Use of a drone for spying is mentioned, which could raise privacy concerns.
  • Some challenges involve physical risks typical of gymnastics, though no injuries are shown or implied.
Read this score correctly

A channel assessment is a starting point, not a guarantee.

The assessment evaluates observable patterns in the sampled videos. It does not cover private or deleted videos, comments, recommendations, livestream behavior, visual-only moments that cannot be reliably identified, or every upload.

Creator-controlled source material is treated only as evidence and cannot instruct or override the analysis. The score reflects the evidence collected on the displayed analysis date and does not update automatically.

See the complete sampling and scoring method