Age-specific YouTube parent guides

YouTube channels for kids ages 5–7

Compare YouTube channel age ratings for early elementary-age children, with separate scores for language, violence, mature topics, commercial pressure, and other concerns. These are parent decision-support ratings, not a guarantee that every upload is appropriate.

1044 published guides

Less promotion for ages 5–7

Page 44 of 44

35/100D’Aydrian Harding@daydrianPopular entertainment

D’Aydrian Harding scores 35 out of 100 for ages 5-7. The sampled videos produced a low score using the ages 5-7 rubric because of the observed concern patterns. The most notable observed areas were language and sexual or suggestive content. A positive pattern was humor or playful interaction appears in multiple sampled videos.

6 videos reviewed
34/100GRACE SHARER@gracesharerPopular entertainment

GRACE SHARER scores 34 out of 100 for ages 5-7. The sampled videos produced a low score using the ages 5-7 rubric because of the observed concern patterns. The most notable observed areas were fear & disturbing themes and violence & intensity. A positive pattern was kindness, empathy, or supportive relationships appear in multiple sampled videos.

12 videos reviewed
34/100ChainsFR@chainsfrPopular entertainment

ChainsFR scores 34 out of 100 for ages 5-7. The sampled videos produced a low score using the ages 5-7 rubric because of the observed concern patterns. The most notable observed areas were language and sexual or suggestive content. A positive pattern was humor or playful interaction appears in multiple sampled videos.

6 videos reviewed
30/100Mindless Self Indulgence@msivideoPopular entertainment

Mindless Self Indulgence scores 30 out of 100 for ages 5-7. The sampled videos produced a low score using the ages 5-7 rubric because of the observed concern patterns. The most notable observed areas were language and fear & disturbing themes. A positive pattern was creativity, imagination, or constructive problem-solving appears in multiple sampled videos.

6 videos reviewed
17/100BooneU@booneuniversityScience & education

BooneU scores 17 out of 100 for ages 5-7. The sampled videos produced a very low score using the ages 5-7 rubric because of the observed concern patterns. The most notable observed areas were mature & sensitive topics and substances & risky behavior. A positive pattern was educational or thought-provoking material appears in multiple sampled videos.

6 videos reviewed
14/100PowerfulJRE@joeroganPopular entertainment

PowerfulJRE scores 14 out of 100 for ages 5-7. Based on this sample, ScreenSignals does not recommend this channel for viewers ages 5-7. The most notable observed areas were mature & sensitive topics and language. A positive pattern was educational or thought-provoking material appears in multiple sampled videos.

12 videos reviewed
14/100LOL! Network@lolnetworkPopular entertainment

LOL! Network scores 14 out of 100 for ages 5-7. The sampled videos produced a very low score using the ages 5-7 rubric because of the observed concern patterns. The most notable observed areas were language and sexual or suggestive content. A positive pattern was humor or playful interaction appears in multiple sampled videos.

12 videos reviewed
14/100Purpose 2K15@purpose2k15Art & making

Purpose 2K15 scores 14 out of 100 for ages 5-7. The sampled videos produced a very low score using the ages 5-7 rubric because of the observed concern patterns. The most notable observed areas were language and sexual or suggestive content. A positive pattern was humor or playful interaction appears in multiple sampled videos.

6 videos reviewed
8/100Visual Venture@visualventurePopular entertainment

Visual Venture scores 8 out of 100 for ages 5-7. The sampled videos produced a very low score using the ages 5-7 rubric because of the observed concern patterns. The most notable observed areas were mature & sensitive topics and fear & disturbing themes. A positive pattern was educational or thought-provoking material appears in multiple sampled videos.

12 videos reviewed
8/100Пенёк ТВ@penektvPopular entertainment

Пенёк ТВ scores 8 out of 100 for ages 5-7. The sampled videos produced a very low score using the ages 5-7 rubric because of the observed concern patterns. The most notable observed areas were language and violence & intensity. A positive pattern was humor or playful interaction appears in multiple sampled videos.

6 videos reviewed
5/100Ape Huncho@apehunchoPopular entertainment

Ape Huncho scores 5 out of 100 for ages 5-7. The sampled videos produced a very low score using the ages 5-7 rubric because of the observed concern patterns. The most notable observed areas were mature & sensitive topics and fear & disturbing themes. A positive pattern was educational or thought-provoking material appears in multiple sampled videos.

12 videos reviewed
5/100Democracy Docket@democracydocketPopular entertainment

Democracy Docket scores 5 out of 100 for ages 5-7. The sampled videos produced a very low score using the ages 5-7 rubric because of the observed concern patterns. The most notable observed areas were mature & sensitive topics and fear & disturbing themes. A positive pattern was kindness, empathy, or supportive relationships appear in multiple sampled videos.

6 videos reviewed