Less scary content for ages 5–7
Page 31 of 48
Tango Tek scores 76 out of 100 for ages 5-7. The sampled videos produced a generally strong score using the ages 5-7 rubric, with some observed cautions. The most notable observed areas were violence & intensity. A positive pattern was creativity, imagination, or constructive problem-solving appears in multiple sampled videos.
6 videos reviewedTarayummy scores 76 out of 100 for ages 5-7. The sampled videos produced a generally strong score using the ages 5-7 rubric, with some observed cautions. The most notable observed areas were language and mature & sensitive topics. A positive pattern was humor or playful interaction appears in multiple sampled videos.
6 videos reviewedThe Spiffing Brit scores 76 out of 100 for ages 5-7. The sampled videos produced a generally strong score using the ages 5-7 rubric, with some observed cautions. The most notable observed areas were violence & intensity and commercial pressure. A positive pattern was humor or playful interaction appears in multiple sampled videos.
6 videos reviewedTheSorryGirls scores 76 out of 100 for ages 5-7. The sampled videos produced a generally strong score using the ages 5-7 rubric, with some observed cautions. The most notable observed areas were commercial pressure. A positive pattern was creativity, imagination, or constructive problem-solving appears in multiple sampled videos.
6 videos reviewedTierZoo scores 76 out of 100 for ages 5-7. The sampled videos produced a generally strong score using the ages 5-7 rubric, with some observed cautions. The most notable observed areas were violence & intensity. A positive pattern was educational or thought-provoking material appears in multiple sampled videos.
6 videos reviewedA24 scores 76 out of 100 for ages 5-7. The sampled videos produced a generally strong score using the ages 5-7 rubric, with some observed cautions. The most notable observed areas were mature & sensitive topics. A positive pattern was creativity, imagination, or constructive problem-solving appears in multiple sampled videos.
6 videos reviewedGameSpot scores 76 out of 100 for ages 5-7. The sampled videos produced a generally strong score using the ages 5-7 rubric, with some observed cautions. The most notable observed areas were violence & intensity.
6 videos reviewedKraig Adams scores 76 out of 100 for ages 5-7. The sampled videos produced a generally strong score using the ages 5-7 rubric, with some observed cautions. The most notable observed areas were commercial pressure. A positive pattern was kindness, empathy, or supportive relationships appear in multiple sampled videos.
6 videos reviewedRoomieOfficial scores 76 out of 100 for ages 5-7. The sampled videos produced a generally strong score using the ages 5-7 rubric, with some observed cautions. The most notable observed areas were mature & sensitive topics. A positive pattern was educational or thought-provoking material appears in multiple sampled videos.
6 videos reviewedStudy To Success scores 76 out of 100 for ages 5-7. The sampled videos produced a generally strong score using the ages 5-7 rubric, with some observed cautions. The most notable observed areas were commercial pressure. A positive pattern was educational or thought-provoking material appears in multiple sampled videos.
6 videos reviewedDonut scores 75 out of 100 for ages 5-7. The sampled videos produced a generally strong score using the ages 5-7 rubric, with some observed cautions. The most notable observed areas were mature & sensitive topics and commercial pressure. A positive pattern was educational or thought-provoking material appears in multiple sampled videos.
12 videos reviewedSuperRaeDizzle scores 75 out of 100 for ages 5-7. The sampled videos produced a generally strong score using the ages 5-7 rubric, with some observed cautions. The most notable observed areas were substances & risky behavior and commercial pressure. A positive pattern was educational or thought-provoking material appears in multiple sampled videos.
12 videos reviewedActivision scores 75 out of 100 for ages 5-7. The sampled videos produced a generally strong score using the ages 5-7 rubric, with some observed cautions. The most notable observed areas were violence & intensity and mature & sensitive topics. A positive pattern was teamwork, cooperation, or sportsmanship appears in multiple sampled videos.
12 videos reviewed442oons scores 75 out of 100 for ages 5-7. The sampled videos produced a generally strong score using the ages 5-7 rubric, with some observed cautions. The most notable observed areas were language and mature & sensitive topics. A positive pattern was humor or playful interaction appears in multiple sampled videos.
6 videos reviewedAbbey Yung scores 75 out of 100 for ages 5-7. The sampled videos produced a generally strong score using the ages 5-7 rubric, with some observed cautions. The most notable observed areas were commercial pressure. A positive pattern was kindness, empathy, or supportive relationships appear in multiple sampled videos.
6 videos reviewedAbdallahSmash scores 75 out of 100 for ages 5-7. The sampled videos produced a generally strong score using the ages 5-7 rubric, with some observed cautions. The most notable observed areas were commercial pressure. A positive pattern was educational or thought-provoking material appears in multiple sampled videos.
6 videos reviewedArvin Olano scores 75 out of 100 for ages 5-7. The sampled videos produced a generally strong score using the ages 5-7 rubric, with some observed cautions. The most notable observed areas were commercial pressure. A positive pattern was creativity, imagination, or constructive problem-solving appears in multiple sampled videos.
6 videos reviewedAustin Eruption scores 75 out of 100 for ages 5-7. The sampled videos produced a generally strong score using the ages 5-7 rubric, with some observed cautions. The most notable observed areas were violence & intensity and commercial pressure. A positive pattern was humor or playful interaction appears in multiple sampled videos.
6 videos reviewedBourbon Moth Woodworking scores 75 out of 100 for ages 5-7. The sampled videos produced a generally strong score using the ages 5-7 rubric, with some observed cautions. The most notable observed areas were commercial pressure. A positive pattern was educational or thought-provoking material appears in multiple sampled videos.
6 videos reviewedCaptainSparklez scores 75 out of 100 for ages 5-7. The sampled videos produced a generally strong score using the ages 5-7 rubric, with some observed cautions. The most notable observed areas were commercial pressure and mature & sensitive topics. A positive pattern was educational or thought-provoking material appears in multiple sampled videos.
6 videos reviewedChristen Dominique scores 75 out of 100 for ages 5-7. The sampled videos produced a generally strong score using the ages 5-7 rubric, with some observed cautions. The most notable observed areas were commercial pressure. A positive pattern was kindness, empathy, or supportive relationships appear in multiple sampled videos.
6 videos reviewedDan Koe scores 75 out of 100 for ages 5-7. The sampled videos produced a generally strong score using the ages 5-7 rubric, with some observed cautions. The most notable observed areas were mature & sensitive topics and language. A positive pattern was educational or thought-provoking material appears in multiple sampled videos.
6 videos reviewedFirst We Feast scores 75 out of 100 for ages 5-7. The sampled videos produced a generally strong score using the ages 5-7 rubric, with some observed cautions. The most notable observed areas were language and commercial pressure. A positive pattern was kindness, empathy, or supportive relationships appear in multiple sampled videos.
6 videos reviewedHammy and Olivia scores 75 out of 100 for ages 5-7. The sampled videos produced a generally strong score using the ages 5-7 rubric, with some observed cautions. The most notable observed areas were commercial pressure. A positive pattern was humor or playful interaction appears in multiple sampled videos.
6 videos reviewed